- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:31:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: pfps-10 untyped literals Date: 28 Jul 2003 16:18:39 +0100 > Peter, > > This message is in regard to a last call comment you made on the RDFCore > semantics document, recorded as: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-10 > > The WG responded, accepting your comment > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0080.html > > Your response was recorded as pending: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0124.html > > As you know we have continued to refine the semantics document, and I > would like to check whether, with the latest editors draft: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ > > we can record that the disposition of your comment is satisfactory. > Please reply, as usual, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org. > > Brian I believe, from my recent review of this document, that it adequately addresses my concerns. However, I believe that the reason this issue was marked as ``pending'' was that I would have liked to have seen explicit references to the changes made to the RDF Semantics document. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent Technologies
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 11:33:00 UTC