- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:29:40 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] > > 2/ The removal of the translation to LBase is a major improvement. I would > have prefered different wording in Section 0.1 concerning this translation > but can live with the new situation. Peter, That is good news. For the record: Concerning the last call comments you made on the RDF Semantics document: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-02 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-03 which concerned the translation to LBase, the RDFCore WG has decided to accept you comment and resolved http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0267.html to replace the lbase appendix with a suitably worded reference to an updated LBase note. Pat has since drafted the reference which you have reviewed in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ Can I take it from your above comment that this resolution of these comments is acceptable to you. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 09:57:31 UTC