Re: Test cases: XML Literal value space and exclusive canonicalization

At 13:55 04/08/03 -0400, Martin Duerst wrote:
>Yes, in particular most C0 control characters, in XML 1.0.
>Most of that will be changed in XML 1.1. The NULL character
>(U+0000) still isn't legal XML 1.1, as far as I know.

I'm offline, so can't check, but I thought many (but not all) of the 
control characters not allowed in XML 1.0 remained so in 1.1.

See my message ...

X-Archived-At: 
http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20030725153840.02a5ce40@127.0.0.1

#g


------------
Graham Klyne          _________
GK@ninebynine.org  ___|_o_o_o_|_¬
                    \____________/
(nb Helva)       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   @Cliveden, River Thames

Received on Sunday, 10 August 2003 07:57:01 UTC