- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 06:34:35 -0400 (EDT)
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: Re: status of RDF tests Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 09:16:00 +0100 > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > Hi: > > > > I notice that some of the RDF tests at http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/ > > are incorrect with respect to the editors' drafts of the RDF > > specification. When will the tests be updated? > > To the best of my knowledge, the tests and specs are consistent. Please > let us know of inconsistencies you find. > > Brian Well, for starters, http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/test001.nt is no longer a legal N-triples document because it has a datatype literal with a language tag. Quite a number of other approved triples documents in the tests are similarly illegal. Also, the test document says that a positive parser test consists of ``one (or more) input documents''. Are there any positive parser tests that have more than one input document? If not, then I suggest modifying the text. By the way, I don't see a point to having more than one input document. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2003 06:36:03 UTC