- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:58:33 -0400 (EDT)
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: pfps-15 say anything quote Date: 30 Jul 2003 14:34:31 +0100 > Peter, > > This message concerns a last call comment you made about the RDF Primer > recorded as: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-15 > > The RDFCore WG accepted your comment and the editor responded to you > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0502.html > > You replied, indicating some disatisfaction with the WG process for > handling comments > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0558.html > > We are now, I hope close to moving the documents on to the next stage. > An updated editor's draft of the primer is available at: > > //www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-primer-20030117/Overview.html > > Please can you reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, > indicating whether you accept the disposition of comment pfps-15. > > Brian My ``say anything'' comment originates in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003janMar/0148.html. This message mentions portions of Primer and Concepts that I feel are contradictory. I need to review both Primer and Concepts to determine whether this comment has been adequately addressed. I don't know the status of Concepts, but Primer (Last Call Revised Editor's Draft 21 July 2003) prominently states that it ``is in an interim state, is frequently changing, and the changes made have not necessarily been agreed to by the RDF Core Working Group.'' This indicates to me that it is not in a state suitable for review. I await stable versions of both Concepts and Primer that are suitable for review. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent Technologies
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 09:59:00 UTC