- From: Jeff Z. Pan <pan@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:33:44 +0100
- To: "pat hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Dear Pat, Thank you for your response. > In response to your comment above,the WG has resolved that to attempt > to define such a proper sub-language is beyond our charter and our > timescale. However, we have resolved > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-layered-subset > > that this issue should be classified as postponed, meaning that it > will be on the agenda of any WG which considers RDF in the future. > > Please let us know if this adequately responds to your comment, CCing > www-rdf-comments@w3.org. As mentioned earlier, I think the point is that the users should be informed the existence of the mentioned problems when they choose to use the non-layering style of RDFS. Therefore, I would be happy with your response *only if* you could also mention these problems in the semantic document. Best regards, Jeff -- Jeff Z. Pan ( http://DL-Web.man.ac.uk/ ) Computer Science Dept., The University of Manchester > > Thanks. > > Pat > > PS> We can continue the more extended debate on another thread if you wish. > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell > phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > >
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 17:25:20 UTC