Re: [closed] re: Pan-01

Dear Pat,

Thank you for your response.

> In response to your comment above,the WG has resolved that to attempt
> to define such a proper sub-language is beyond our charter and our
> timescale. However, we have resolved
>
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-layered-subset
>
> that this issue should be classified as postponed, meaning that it
> will be on the agenda of any WG which considers RDF in the future.
>
> Please let us know if this adequately responds to your comment, CCing
> www-rdf-comments@w3.org.


As mentioned earlier, I think the point is that the users should
be informed the existence of the mentioned problems when they
choose to use the non-layering style of RDFS. Therefore, I would be happy with your response *only
if* you could also mention these problems in the semantic document.

Best regards,
Jeff
--
Jeff Z. Pan  ( http://DL-Web.man.ac.uk/ )
Computer Science Dept., The University of Manchester




>
> Thanks.
>
> Pat
>
> PS> We can continue the more extended debate on another thread if you wish.
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
> 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32501 (850)291 0667    cell
> phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>

Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 17:25:20 UTC