- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:34:20 -0400 (EDT)
- To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: phayes@ai.uwf.edu, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> Subject: pfps-09 Date: 24 Jul 2003 16:29:46 +0100 > Peter, > > With respect to your comment recorded as > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-09 > > The RDFCore WG have resolved > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0173.html > > to accept this comment. > > As you know, there have been modifications to the description of the > datatyping semantics since your comment was written. > > The current editor's draft > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ > > now contains an account of datatyping which defines interpretations > relative to functions (called datatype maps) from URIrefs to > datatypes. This provides a way to have a URIref be a 'name' of a > datatype while not including the name as part of the definition of > the datatype itself. As the text notes, datatypes are first-class > individuals which can be subject to identity reasoning in semantic > extensions (such as OWL). > > Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, > indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment. > > Brian I believe that the version of RDF Semantics http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ satisfactorily handles naming issues related to datatypes. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 11:35:52 UTC