- From: Daniel \ <eikeon@eikeon.com>
- Date: 01 Aug 2003 16:35:48 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: "www-rdf-comments@w3.org" <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 09:21, Dan Brickley wrote: > Daniel, > > In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0384.html > you requested the RDF Core WG consider the creation of an rdfs:Schema class to > the RDF Schema specification. This was recorded as an RDF Core Last Call > issue 'eikon-01', http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#eikon-01 > > The working group considered your proposal, and discussed it in the > 2003-05-02 telecon ([1]). While we did not decide to create a new > class called 'rdfs:Schema', the group accepts your case that a class > to support such functionality is needed and useful. We decided to > endorse the use of the owl:Ontology class (specified by the Web Ontology > WG), rather than create a new, similar class. > > This is a proposal to close RDF Core LC issue 'eikon-01', with the > resolution to use owl:Ontology where rdfs:Schema was proposed. Could you > please indicate by replying to this message, copying > www-rdf-comments@w3.org, whether this response is satisfactory. The resolution sounds good. > Thanks again for your contribution to this work. Likewise, thank you. > Dan > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0031.html -- Daniel Krech, http://eikeon.com/ Redfoot.net, http://redfoot.net/ RDFLib.net, http://rdflib.net/
Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 16:26:37 UTC