Re: add a triviallyTrue predicate (proposal to close LC issue danc-04)

Dan,

re http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#danc-04

In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0071.html
you requested that the RDF Core WG consider adding an
'rdfs:triviallyTrue' predicate to the RDF Schema specification.

The working group considered your proposal, and resolved unanimously in its
2003-05-02 teleconference[1] not to accept it as a change against the RDF
Core Last Call specs. It was felt that this construct was an interesting 
suggestion worthy of further investigation by implementors, but its
standardisation should be postponed to future work. 

This is a therefore a proposal to close RDF Core Last Call issue
'danc-04'. Could you please indicate by replying to this message,
copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, whether this reponse is satisfactory.

thanks,

Dan


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0031.html
excerpt, 
[[
item 11: danc-04 add a trivially true predicate

Discussion of background to this issue -- comments, xml comments,
xml schema comments and rdf comments

PROPOSED to postpone danc-04 on the grounds that:
it's too new, too late and not sufficiently motivated, well
understood or discussed, and could be explored in later specs.
Give encouragement to try implementing this.

prop danbri; seconded jjc; against 0; abstain: 0

APPROVED danc-04 postponement

ACTION 20030502#9 bwm add danc-04 to postponed issues
list
ACTION 20030502#10 danbri send the formal response on
postponing danc-04 to the comments list and submitter
along with grounds for postponal.
]]

Received on Thursday, 31 July 2003 08:58:26 UTC