[closed] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"

Peter,

With reference to your comments raised in:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0148.html
and subsequent exchanges linked from:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0314.html
specifically with reference to the issue of reserved names in the RDF 
syntax, and the notion of uses "sanctioned by" RDF, which were crystalized in:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0194.html

The RDFcore working group has resolved per:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0207.html
(agendum 16) to revise the text along the lines of:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0201.html

Revised text can be previewed in the editors' working draft at:
   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117

Could you please respond, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, indicating 
whether or not you regard your comments have been adequately addressed.

Thank you for your attention,

Graham Klyne
(for RDFcore working group)

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E

Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 05:33:07 UTC