- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 10:26:19 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Peter, With reference to your comments raised in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0148.html and subsequent exchanges linked from: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0314.html specifically with reference to the issue of reserved names in the RDF syntax, and the notion of uses "sanctioned by" RDF, which were crystalized in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0194.html The RDFcore working group has resolved per: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0207.html (agendum 16) to revise the text along the lines of: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0201.html Revised text can be previewed in the editors' working draft at: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117 Could you please respond, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, indicating whether or not you regard your comments have been adequately addressed. Thank you for your attention, Graham Klyne (for RDFcore working group) #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 05:33:07 UTC