- From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:08:57 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
>I don't see how there can be a satisfactory solution at the moment as there >is no stable version of LBase to translate into, so I cannot determine any >enduring characteristics of the translation. I would note that the entire section is an informative appendix. >Under the current editor's working copy available as of 2 July >2003, some RDF literals (e.g., " ' ") translate into illegal LBase. Ah, because I removed the backslash escapes. I put in a textual warning about this, but maybe it would be better to put the full form back into the tables. Ok, done. I also added a note about LanguageTag. > I >noticed this in a very quick perusal of the LBase document - I would need >much more time for a complete examination, which seems rather pointless to >do on an editor's working copy. Point taken. In fact the substantive parts of the Lbase document have been stable for a long time, but the status of the document seems to be frozen in some W3C administrative hyperspace. I will try to get that fixed ASAP and get back to you. Enjoy the holiday. Pat >Peter F. Patel-Schneider >Bell Labs Research >Lucent Technologies > > >From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> >Subject: [resolution]pfps-02; was: Comment on Last Call Working >Draft of RDF Semantics document concerning Lbase translation of XML >Literals >Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 19:26:49 -0500 > >> Peter, >> >> with reference to your comment >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0093.html >> >> archived as pfps-02, I am writing to ask if the following would be an >> acceptable response. If so, I will propose that the WG accept your >> comment with this resolution. >> >> As you know, there have been extensive modifications to the treatment >> of XML literals since your comment was written. >> >> The current editor's draft >> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html#Lbase >> now contains a version of the Lbase translation rules which I believe >> adequately covers the case you mention. XML Literals are now treated >> exactly uniformly with other typed literals in the Lbase axioms. >> Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, >> indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment. >> >> Sincerely >> >> Pat >> -- >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home >> 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office >> Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax >> FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell >> phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes >> -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2003 15:08:59 UTC