- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 21 Jul 2003 14:22:45 +0100
- To: pfps@research.bell-labs.com, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Peter, with reference to your comment recorded as http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-04 the RDFCore WG has resolved to accept your comment. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jul/0173.html As you know, there have been extensive modifications to the RDF entailment rules since your comment was written The current editor's draft, which is now stable enough to review, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ now contains a version of the RDF entailment rules which we believe corresponds directly to the RDF semantic conditions in the sense described. You can check the proof contained in the specification. Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment. Brian
Received on Monday, 21 July 2003 09:26:16 UTC