Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 07:36:28 -0400 (EDT)
• To: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
• Cc: gk@ninebynine.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20030807.073628.74187152.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [proposal to close] pfps-22,pfps-23: "reserved names in abstract syntax"
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:26:16 +0100

> On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 06:45:58 -0400 (EDT)
> "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> 
> > Dave said:
> > >  [[The RDF vocabulary is identified by this namespace name and 
> > >   consists of the following names only:]]
> > 
> > I am concerned with the ``identified by this namespace name''.  A namespace
> > name does not identify a vocabulary.  
> 
> Please explain why this is not the case.
> 
> Dave

Vocabulary 1:

	rdf:first rdf:rest

Vocabulary 2:

	rdf:List rdf:nil

What namespaces names can be used to identify these vocabularies?

peter

Received on Thursday, 7 August 2003 07:36:40 UTC