- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:13:57 +0300
- To: <phayes@ihmc.us>, <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext pat hayes [mailto:phayes@ihmc.us] > Sent: 08 July, 2003 05:40 > To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: possible peculiarity with empty datatypes > > > > >Hi: > > > >A datatype, d, with an empty value space may end up in an > unusual state > >because it has no instances, and thus would not trigger any > > x rdf:type d > >semantic conditions (assuming that such semantic conditions > are included in > >RDFS). > > My own sense is that there should be no such datatype. I will add > this to the required conditions for a datatype, ie that the value > space is nonempty. Perhaps better to specify that the lexical space is non-empty, which is an equally reasonable constraint, I think, and then it will follow from the definition of L2V that the value space is thus nonempty. ??? Patrick
Received on Tuesday, 8 July 2003 04:14:03 UTC