Re: pfps-04 (why the thread is germane to pfps-04)

Hello Pat,

Many thanks for these good news.

Regards,    Martin.

At 00:04 03/07/29 -0500, pat hayes wrote:
>Hi Martin
>
>Just to keep you informed, the latest version of the RDF semantics doc now 
>avoids all ambiguity and shilly-shallying on these issues. It says 
>unequivocally that:
>
>1. XML literals denote things which are in 1:1 correspondence with 
>canonical XML content but are not, themselves, identical to character 
>strings. (It defers to the Concepts document for exactly what those things 
>really are, but just this is enough to make the semantics work properly. )
>
>2.   XSD xsd:strings denote the same things as RDF plain literals (without 
>language tags). The reverse isnt quite exactly true because RDF syntax 
>doesn't forbid the XML-excluded Unicode control blocks, but if you can 
>write it in XML at all, then its the same string as a plain literal and as 
>a xsd:string typed literal.
>
>Pat
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>IHMC    (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
>40 South Alcaniz St.    (850)202 4416   office
>Pensacola                       (850)202 4440   fax
>FL 32501                        (850)291 0667    cell
>phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>

Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 17:48:45 UTC