- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 19:23:30 -0400 (EDT)
- To: phayes@ihmc.us
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> Subject: Re: pfps-04 [RDF entailment rules not yet complete] Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 18:18:37 -0500 > >I believe that the rules for rdf entailments are still incomplete in > >RDF Semantics (Editors [sic] Draft of July 27). > > > >For example, consider the RDF graph > > > > ex:foo ex:bar "<ex/>"^^rdf:XMLLiteral . > > > >I believe that this graph rdf-entails > > > > ex:foo ex:bar "<ex></ex>"^^rdf:XMLLiteral . > > ?? Can you say why ? > > Pat Because the only possible rational reading of the normative definition of XML literals in RDF Concepts is the reading that has both of these literals be well-typed XML literals, and they both have the same canonical form. Note that this has already been the subject of several other messages on this thread. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent Technologies
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2003 19:25:09 UTC