- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 17:10:02 -0400
- To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, msm@w3.org
At 12:17 03/08/07 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote: >At 13:55 04/08/03 -0400, Martin Duerst wrote: >>Yes, in particular most C0 control characters, in XML 1.0. >>Most of that will be changed in XML 1.1. The NULL character >>(U+0000) still isn't legal XML 1.1, as far as I know. > >I'm offline, so can't check, but I thought many (but not all) of the >control characters not allowed in XML 1.0 remained so in 1.1. They cannot be used directly, but they can be used if encoded as numeric character references (important to avoid some security problems,...). See http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11/#sec4.1: >>>> 4.1 Character and Entity References Change the Well-formedness constraint: Legal Character to read: Characters referred to using character references must either match the production for Char, or be one of the ISO control characters in the ranges [#x1-#x1F] or [#x7F-#x9F]. >>>> Regards, Martin. >See my message ... > >X-Archived-At: >http://www.w3.org/mid/5.1.0.14.2.20030725153840.02a5ce40@127.0.0.1 > >#g > > >------------ >Graham Klyne _________ >GK@ninebynine.org ___|_o_o_o_|_ャ > \____________/ >(nb Helva) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ @Cliveden, River Thames >
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 09:55:50 UTC