public-webapps@w3.org from October to December 2009 by date

Tuesday, 29 December 2009

• Letter to the W3C Web Applications WG from ISO JTC1/SC 34/WG4 Innovimax SARL

Thursday, 24 December 2009

• Re: [XHR][XHR2] single source file Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR][XHR2] single source file Marcos Caceres

Wednesday, 23 December 2009

• [XHR][XHR2] single source file Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Anne van Kesteren
• WebApps' 2009 publication summary -> KUTGW! Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Introduce a pause/resume pattern for coordinated access to multiple stores Nikunj R. Mehta
• [WebSimpleDB] Introduce a pause/resume pattern for coordinated access to multiple stores Pablo Castro

Tuesday, 22 December 2009

• RE: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere Pablo Castro
• RE: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 Adrian Bateman
• Re: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 Nikunj R. Mehta
• Seeking comments on LCWDs of Server-events, Web Storage, Web Workers; deadline 30-June-2010 Arthur Barstow
• RE: [widgets] View Modes Media Feature document from Vodafone Marcin Hanclik
• Re: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 Adrian Bateman
• RE: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 Adrian Bateman
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Adam Barth
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson

Monday, 21 December 2009

• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 Marcos Caceres
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] white space handling Cyril Concolato
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Jonas Sicking

Sunday, 20 December 2009

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Marcos Caceres
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Julian Reschke
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Marcos Caceres
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? Ian Hickson
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? Adam Barth
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? Adam Barth

Saturday, 19 December 2009

• Re: [widgets] Anyone working on SNIFF in Java? Adam Barth
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Alex Russell

Friday, 18 December 2009

• RE: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) Larry Masinter
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Marcos Caceres
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: [widgets] white space handling Robin Berjon
• Are we making a Category Mistake? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Mark S. Miller
• Re: [widgets] white space handling Cyril Concolato
• Re: Seeking status of testing Widget Digital Signature spec Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [widgets] white space handling Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] View Modes Media Feature document from Vodafone Arthur Barstow
• Re: Why preflight per-resource rather than per-origin? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [widgets] white space handling Cyril Concolato
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• Re: [widgets] Anyone working on SNIFF in Java? Marcos Caceres
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson

Thursday, 17 December 2009

• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Jonas Sicking
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Boris Zbarsky
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• [widgets] Anyone working on SNIFF in Java? Scott Wilson
• Why preflight per-resource rather than per-origin? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Jonas Sicking
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Jonas Sicking
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections Nikunj Mehta
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Jonas Sicking
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Jonas Sicking
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: [widgets] test-suite: start file encoding Marcos Caceres
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Jonas Sicking
• [widgets] test-suite: start file encoding Scott Wilson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 17 December 2009 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] Authorities will never have authority? Jonathan Rees
• [widgets] white space handling Cyril Concolato
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Henri Sivonen
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Maciej Stachowiak
• [DataCache] Event Handlers on DataCache Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Devdatta
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Devdatta
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• [DataCache] Remove or Replace a Local Server Handler? Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Ian Hickson
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Kenton Varda
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Ian Hickson
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) Larry Masinter
• Re: [DataCache] CacheTransaction missing committed state Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Arthur Barstow
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections Joseph Pecoraro

Wednesday, 16 December 2009

• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections Nikunj R. Mehta
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Arthur Barstow
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Jonas Sicking
• Re: The most basic File API use case Jonas Sicking
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Ian Hickson
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?) Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Arthur Barstow
• FW: [widgets] comments re View Modes Interface spec Yael.Aharon@nokia.com
• Re: The most basic File API use case Robin Berjon
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?) Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Ian Hickson
• Re: [xhr] Blocked headers with underscore rather than hyphen (was: Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call) sird@rckc.at
• [xhr] Blocked headers with underscore rather than hyphen (was: Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Small text correction. Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Comments on Last Call Working Draft of XHR Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Anne van Kesteren
• [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?) Anne van Kesteren
• Regrets Marcin Hanclik
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 17 December 2009 voice conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: Widget specification - liquid height support Marcos Caceres
• Widget packaging conformance Eyal Sela
• RE: Widget specification - liquid height support Eyal Sela
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] duplicated feature elements ? Cyril Concolato
• [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Cyril Concolato
• [widgets] features: default value for required Cyril Concolato
• RE: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Adrian Bateman
• RE: Microsoft pre-LCWD feedback on WebSocket API Adrian Bateman
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3) timeless

Tuesday, 15 December 2009

• Re: [AC/CORS] Proper behavior for user agents who return 'null' Access-Control-Allow-Origin Jonas Sicking
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Adam Barth
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5) Julian Reschke
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (2) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] test suite: br.wgt Marcos Caceres
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] test suite: br.wgt Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] test suite: br.wgt Marcos Caceres
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5) Julian Reschke
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3) Robin Berjon
• [widgets] test suite: br.wgt Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute Marcos Caceres
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (2) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (1) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (4) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) Robin Berjon
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Arthur Barstow
• Re: [AC/CORS] Proper behavior for user agents who return 'null' Access-Control-Allow-Origin Anne van Kesteren
• [XHR] Small text correction. Huub Schaeks
• Re: [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute Cyril Concolato
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Adam Barth
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] Mark S. Miller

Monday, 14 December 2009

• Re: Caching breakout session at TPAC Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Adam Barth
• Re: Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] Adam Barth
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Adam Barth
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs Arthur Barstow
• CfC: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] Arthur Barstow
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Devdatta
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Jonathan Rees
• Re: Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] Tyler Close
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Maciej Stachowiak
• Indexed Database API (previously WebSimpleDB) ready for a new WD Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Tyler Close
• Re: Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] Adam Barth
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Adam Barth
• [widgets] Widget Updates PAG recommendations Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute Marcos Caceres
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Jonathan Rees
• [widgets] View Modes Media Feature document from Vodafone Arthur Barstow
• Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] Arthur Barstow
• Re: [AC/CORS] Proper behavior for user agents who return 'null' Access-Control-Allow-Origin Jonas Sicking
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Adam Barth
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Maciej Stachowiak

Sunday, 13 December 2009

• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Mark S. Miller
• Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Mark S. Miller
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Mark S. Miller
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Adam Barth
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Mark S. Miller
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Mark S. Miller
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Adam Barth

Saturday, 12 December 2009

• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Arun Ranganathan
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Nikunj R. Mehta

Friday, 11 December 2009

• Re: [DataCache] Updated Examples Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Flatting APIs to simplify primary cases Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: WebSimpleDB Issues Nikunj R. Mehta
• [widgets] Widget Interface Test Suite Marcos Caceres
• Re: Widget specification - liquid height support Robin Berjon
• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains Thomas Roessler
• Re: Web Storage Mutex Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [AC/CORS] Proper behavior for user agents who return 'null' Access-Control-Allow-Origin Anne van Kesteren
• Web Storage Mutex Joran Greef

Thursday, 10 December 2009

• [AC/CORS] Proper behavior for user agents who return 'null' Access-Control-Allow-Origin Scott Parkerson
• WebGL | The 3D Canvas Context for HTML Arun Ranganathan
• Widget specification - liquid height support Amit Kasher
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Marcos Caceres
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Tyler Close
• [DataCache] Updated Examples Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: The most basic File API use case Eric Uhrhane
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Mark S. Miller
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Ian Hickson
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Tyler Close
• [DataCache] CacheTransaction missing committed state Joseph Pecoraro
• [DataCache] Unhandled Cases in Networking Changes Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? Arthur Barstow
• Fwd: Draft PER of Associating Style Sheets with XML documents 1.0 (Second Edition) available for review Simon Pieters
• Re: The most basic File API use case Jonas Sicking
• [DataCache] "ready" CacheEvent and Related Questions Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: The most basic File API use case Peter O. Ussuri
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Ian Hickson
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Tyler Close
• [WARP] comment on subdomains Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 10 December 2009 Voice Conference Stephen Jolly
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 10 December 2009 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP Stephen Jolly
• Re: File API: Directories and System Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Ian Hickson
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Scott Wilson

Wednesday, 9 December 2009

• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Tyler Close
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Marcos Caceres
• Re: The most basic File API use case Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Ian Hickson
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) Marcin Hanclik
• Re: The most basic File API use case Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Tyler Close
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) Larry Masinter
• File API: Directories and System Robin Berjon
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (4) Larry Masinter
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3) Larry Masinter
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Ian Hickson
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Tyler Close
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (2) Larry Masinter
• Re: Length of LC comment period Marcos Caceres
• Re: Length of LC comment period Ian Hickson
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Ian Hickson
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Tyler Close
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Scott Wilson
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Robin Berjon
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 10 December 2009 Voice Conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Cyril Concolato
• Re: Length of LC comment period Ian Hickson
• Re: Length of LC comment period Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Cyril Concolato
• [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) Cyril Concolato
• RE: [EventSource] Comments to the current draft Ian Hickson
• Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call sird@rckc.at
• Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call sird@rckc.at
• Re: Length of LC comment period Ian Hickson
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Ian Hickson
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Length of LC comment period Marcos Caceres

Tuesday, 8 December 2009

• oops: Re: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (EricLaw) =JeffH
• Re: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (Adam) =JeffH
• Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (EricLaw) =JeffH
• Strict Transport Security (STS) discussion -> public-web-security@w3.org =JeffH
• Re: Welcome to the W3C web security mailing list Thomas Roessler
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Sebastian Andersson
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Tyler Close
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Ian Hickson
• [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Tyler Close
• Re: The most basic File API use case Robin Berjon
• Re: Length of LC comment period Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Length of LC comment period Marcos Caceres
• Re: Length of LC comment period Ian Hickson
• Re: Length of LC comment period Arthur Barstow
• Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging Ian Hickson
• Re: Length of LC comment period Ian Hickson
• Re: Length of LC comment period Marcos Caceres
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Robin Berjon
• Re: The most basic File API use case Jonas Sicking
• CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December Arthur Barstow
• RE: [EventSource] Comments to the current draft SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)

Monday, 7 December 2009

• Re: The most basic File API use case Peter O. Ussuri
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections Joseph Pecoraro
• RE: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) Larry Masinter
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (1) Larry Masinter
• Re: Patent disclosure for UniMess? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS] Tyler Close
• Re: Patent disclosure for UM? [Was: Patent disclosure for UniMess? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS]] Arthur Barstow
• Patent disclosure for UM? [Was: Patent disclosure for UniMess? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS]] Mark S. Miller
• XHR LC comment: header encoding Julian Reschke
• Re: The most basic File API use case Robin Berjon
• Re: Length of LC comment period Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Length of LC comment period Ian Hickson
• RE: [widgets] comments re View Modes Interface spec Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Arthur Barstow
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Marcos Caceres
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Ian Hickson

Sunday, 6 December 2009

• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Marcos Caceres
• Patent disclosure for UniMess? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS] Arthur Barstow
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Ian Hickson
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Arthur Barstow
• Spam Alert (was: Warning Notice!!!) Doug Schepers

Friday, 4 December 2009

• Re: suggestion - RJavaScript David Rajchenbach-Teller

Saturday, 5 December 2009

• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Ian Hickson
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Ian Hickson
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Ian Hickson

Friday, 4 December 2009

• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS] Mark S. Miller
• CORS versus Uniform Messaging? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS] Arthur Barstow
• [DataCache] Some Corrections Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: suggestion - RJavaScript Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Scott Wilson
• [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute Cyril Concolato
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Sebastian Andersson
• [widgets] comments re View Modes Interface spec Arthur Barstow
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Ian Hickson
• Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] Arthur Barstow
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Ian Hickson
• suggestion - RJavaScript inhahe
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Sebastian Andersson
• Re: The most basic File API use case Eric Uhrhane
• Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit Ian Hickson
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Ian Hickson
• Re: Microsoft pre-LCWD feedback on WebSocket API Ian Hickson

Thursday, 3 December 2009

• Re: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (part 2) =JeffH
• Re: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (part 1) =JeffH
• Re: Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs Jeremy Orlow
• RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs Jeremy Orlow
• Re: XHR LC Jonas Sicking
• XHR LC Julian Reschke
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 3 December 2009 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Interface published Kai Hendry
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Marcos Caceres
• RE: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP Robin Berjon
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP Stephen Jolly
• Re: Fwd: Welcome to the W3C web security mailing list =JeffH

Wednesday, 2 December 2009

• Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs Arthur Barstow
• RE: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Indexed Database API is the new title [Was: Renaming WebSimpleDB] Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: WebSimpleDB Issues Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Arthur Barstow
• Indexed Database API is the new title [Was: Renaming WebSimpleDB] Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference Robin Berjon
• RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference Robin Berjon
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 3 December 2009 Voice Conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Robin Berjon
• RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Arthur Barstow
• Re: Transaction callback for localStorage mutex? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Transaction callback for localStorage mutex? Jeremy Orlow
• RE: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Marcin Hanclik
• WebSimpleDB Issues Kris Zyp
• Re: [webdatabase] Handling of the query arguments Ian Hickson
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Ian Hickson
• Re: Transaction callback for localStorage mutex? Ian Hickson
• Re: Transaction callback for localStorage mutex? Aaron Boodman
• Transaction callback for localStorage mutex? Adam Barth

Tuesday, 1 December 2009

• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Marcos Caceres
• RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference Marcin Hanclik
• RE: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization Marcos Caceres
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Charles McCathieNevile
• Fwd: Welcome to the W3C web security mailing list Thomas Roessler
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) Robin Berjon
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache Ian Hickson
• [Bug 8406] New: Stricter Specifications on Mouse Events Specifically primary, auxillary, and secondary default actions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Ian Hickson
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [EventSource] Comments to the current draft Ian Hickson
• Re: [webdatabase] wording on "Parsing and processing SQL statements" section Ian Hickson
• Re: WebDatabase bug tracking Ian Hickson
• Re: [web databases] SQLStatementErrorCallback Ian Hickson
• Re: [web databases] changeVersion error reporting Ian Hickson
• Re: [webdatabase] Minor Clarification Needed in Processing Model Ian Hickson
• Re: [web databases] about rowids Ian Hickson
• RE: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September Ian Hickson
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Frederick Hirsch
• Re: WebDatabase review: SQLResultSetRowList Ian Hickson
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Michael Nordman
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Ian Hickson

Monday, 30 November 2009

• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] Reminder: the Widget Interface LC comment period ends December 8 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Publishing LC#2 of the WARP spec Robin Berjon
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference Robin Berjon
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP Robin Berjon
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP Stephen Jolly
• [widgets] PAG Launched for Widgets 1.0: Access Requests Policy (WARP) spec Arthur Barstow
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization Robin Berjon
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [widgets] test-suite, default xml:lang Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Robin Berjon
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] Interface published Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] Test suite full coverage of mandatory aspects in the P&C spec, was Re: OMTP BONDI Reference Implementation fully compliant against mandatory P&C tests Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Test suite full coverage of mandatory aspects in the P&C spec, was Re: OMTP BONDI Reference Implementation fully compliant against mandatory P&C tests Scott Wilson

Sunday, 29 November 2009

• [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors Scott Wilson

Saturday, 28 November 2009

• Re: [widgets] Test suite full coverage of mandatory aspects in the P&C spec, was Re: OMTP BONDI Reference Implementation fully compliant against mandatory P&C tests Scott Wilson
• [widgets] Test suite full coverage of mandatory aspects in the P&C spec, was Re: OMTP BONDI Reference Implementation fully compliant against mandatory P&C tests Marcos Caceres
• OMTP BONDI Reference Implementation fully compliant against mandatory P&C tests David Rogers
• Re: The most basic File API use case Peter O. Ussuri
• Re: The most basic File API use case Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Maciej Stachowiak

Friday, 27 November 2009

• Re: [widgets] test suite, duplicated test Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] test-suite, default xml:lang Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] editing problem Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Testing ITS support Marcos Caceres
• RE: [widgets] editing problem Marcin Hanclik
• [widgets] editing problem Cyril Concolato
• [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Testing ITS support Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] test suite, duplicated test Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] about test d1.wgt Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Testing ITS support Felix Sasaki
• Re: Selectors CR criteria Lachlan Hunt
• RE: [widgets] Testing ITS support Richard Ishida
• Re: [widgets] test-suite, default xml:lang Cyril Concolato
• [widgets] Testing ITS support Marcos Caceres

Thursday, 26 November 2009

• Selectors CR criteria (was re: Something else) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Sean Hogan
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Simon Pieters
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Lachlan Hunt
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Boris Zbarsky
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Boris Zbarsky
• Comments on Last Call Working Draft of XHR Richard Ishida
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Kartikaya Gupta
• Re: [widgets] about test d1.wgt Cyril Concolato
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Charles McCathieNevile
• [widgets] test-suite, default xml:lang Cyril Concolato
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Henri Sivonen
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Lachlan Hunt
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Lachlan Hunt
• [widgets] element-based localization Cyril Concolato
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Jonathan Watt
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Arthur Barstow
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Jonathan Watt
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Jonathan Watt
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Ian Hickson
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Henri Sivonen
• [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace Jonathan Watt
• Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database ATSUSHI TAKAYAMA
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database João Eiras
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database Ian Hickson
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database Ian Hickson
• Re: Exceptions in WebDatabase Ian Hickson
• Re: WebDatabase open interface methods Ian Hickson
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database João Eiras
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database Ian Hickson
• Re: WebStorage and WebDatabase - creation and exceptions Ian Hickson
• Re: [webdatabase] Transaction Locks Ian Hickson
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database João Eiras
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database Ian Hickson
• Re: Detailed review of 4.12. Client-side database storage Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 25 November 2009

• [Bug 8358] [WA] Fix for the localStorage mutex problem - release for *any* API operation except localStorage itself bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Nikunj R. Mehta
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Boris Zbarsky
• XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG Klotz, Leigh
• [widgets] Publishing LC#2 of the WARP spec Arthur Barstow
• Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Sebastian Andersson
• Re: WebSimpleDB object caching Nikunj R. Mehta
• Postponed: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Sever-Sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Interface published Marcos Caceres
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 24 November 2009

• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Flatting APIs to simplify primary cases Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere Shawn Wilsher
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Arthur Barstow
• Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Progress Lachlan Hunt
• Widgeon release (was P+C implementation report: Widgeon) Robin Berjon

Monday, 23 November 2009

• [Bug 8358] New: Fix for the localStorage mutex problem - release for *any* API operation except localStorage itself bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS Tyler Close
• P+C implementation report: Widgeon Robin Berjon
• Re: The most basic File API use case Peter O. Ussuri
• Re: [webdatabase] Why does W3C have to worry about SQL dialect? Robert O'Callahan

Sunday, 22 November 2009

• [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere Pablo Castro
• RE: File writing ponderings (was: Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy) Marcin Hanclik
• What is the Plan for Web Database? [Was: Re: Notes About Notes Arthur Barstow
• ISSUE-111 (mouse z): Add z attribute to mouse events? [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 21 November 2009

• Re: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS Mark S. Miller
• Re: [webdatabase] Why does W3C have to worry about SQL dialect? Kris Zyp
• [webdatabase] Why does W3C have to worry about SQL dialect? Dan Forsberg
• Notes About Notes (was: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note) Doug Schepers
• Re: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS Jonas Sicking
• Re: File writing ponderings (was: Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy) Aaron Boodman
• File writing ponderings (was: Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Jonas Sicking
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Jonas Sicking
• [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS Tyler Close
• Re: The most basic File API use case Arun Ranganathan
• RE: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) Marcin Hanclik

Friday, 20 November 2009

• [widgets] FW: [whatwg] FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages Marcin Hanclik
• The most basic File API use case Peter O. Ussuri
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) Marcos Caceres
• RE: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) Marcos Caceres
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy richard.tibbett@orange-ftgroup.com
• Re: [widgets] about test d1.wgt Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute Robin Berjon
• [widgets] about test d1.wgt Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] multiple co-authors Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute Robin Berjon
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Robin Berjon
• [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference Marcin Hanclik
• [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases Marcos Caceres
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Adam Barth
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Robin Berjon
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Robin Berjon
• Re: Unzipping content into current directory widely considered poor practice Dan Brickley
• Re: Unzipping content into current directory widely considered poor practice Arthur Barstow
• Re: Unzipping content into current directory widely considered poor practice Marcos Caceres
• Re: Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24 ( LC-2255) Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite Robin Berjon
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Frederick Hirsch
• Re: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (2) Marcos Caceres
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Marcin Hanclik
• RE: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Adrian Bateman
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite Marcos Caceres
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Frederick Hirsch
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases Samuel Santos
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) Marcin Hanclik
• CfC: to publish LCWD of: Sever-Sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers; deadline 27 November Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases Scott Wilson
• Re: [widgets] multiple co-authors Scott Wilson
• [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) Marcin Hanclik
• RE: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (2) Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite Cyril Concolato
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Marcin Hanclik
• Unzipping content into current directory widely considered poor practice Dan Brickley
• RE: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Adrian Bateman
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Jonas Sicking
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Moving Window and stuff out of HTML5 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Jonas Sicking
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Marcin Hanclik
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Marcin Hanclik

Thursday, 19 November 2009

• Security evaluation of an example DAP policy Adam Barth
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases Marcos Caceres
• RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [webdatabase] Handling of the query arguments João Eiras
• Re: [webdatabase] Handling of the query arguments Maciej Stachowiak
• [webdatabase] Handling of the query arguments João Eiras
• RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) Marcin Hanclik
• RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) Marcin Hanclik
• Moving Window and stuff out of HTML5 Krzysztof Maczyński
• Re: [widgets] multiple co-authors Marcos Caceres
• Microsoft pre-LCWD feedback on WebSocket API Adrian Bateman
• Re: [widgets] multiple co-authors Marcos Caceres
• [WebSimpleDB] Flatting APIs to simplify primary cases Pablo Castro
• Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) Marcin Hanclik
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) Adam Barth
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Adam Barth
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Adam Barth
• RE: Viewmode related issues Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (1) Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] Interface published Kai Hendry
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (2) Robin Berjon
• Re: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (2) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Interface published Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] Interface published Kai Hendry
• RE: Constrained specification of Icon element Ola Andersson
• Re: Constrained specification of Icon element Marcos Caceres
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3) Robin Berjon
• Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) Robin Berjon
• RE: [widgets] The people say "NO" to 1.0, was Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (9) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (8) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (4) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5) Robin Berjon
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (6) Robin Berjon
• [widgets] The people say "NO" to 1.0, was Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) Marcos Caceres
• Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] multiple co-authors Marcos Caceres
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [WARP] Call for comments on pre-LC#2 of WARP spec; deadline 18 November Robin Berjon
• Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) Robin Berjon
• [widgets] multiple co-authors Scott Wilson
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) David Rogers
• Re: [WARP] Call for comments on pre-LC#2 of WARP spec; deadline 18 November Marcos Caceres
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) David Rogers
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Robert O'Callahan
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Robin Berjon
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API Robin Berjon
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) David Rogers
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) David Rogers
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) David Rogers
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) David Rogers
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcin Hanclik
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) David Rogers
• RE: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API Marcin Hanclik
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Marcin Hanclik
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Robin Berjon
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Jonas Sicking
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Robert O'Callahan
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Robin Berjon
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Robert O'Callahan
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Marcin Hanclik
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Marcin Hanclik
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Marcin Hanclik
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcin Hanclik
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Adam Barth
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Frederick Hirsch
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Lachlan Hunt

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API Arun Ranganathan
• CfC - publish Selectors API as CR Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Exit criteria Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR Charles McCathieNevile
• [WARP] Call for comments on pre-LC#2 of WARP spec; deadline 18 November Suresh Chitturi
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Robert O'Callahan
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Blob as URN was Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Eric Uhrhane
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Julian Reschke
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Robin Berjon
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Robin Berjon
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) Marcin Hanclik
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 19-Nov-2009 Voice Conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases Scott Wilson
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcin Hanclik
• RE: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (1) Marcin Hanclik
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) David Rogers
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
• RE: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API Marcin Hanclik
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?) Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?) Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Julian Reschke
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November Arthur Barstow
• RE: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (1) Marcin Hanclik
• [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (2) Marcin Hanclik
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (1) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Robin Berjon
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Robin Berjon
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Robin Berjon
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Robin Berjon
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite Robin Berjon
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Robin Berjon
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Jeremy Orlow
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November Robin Berjon
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: File upload superseded by File API? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Anne van Kesteren
• File upload superseded by File API? Dominique Hazael-Massieux

Tuesday, 17 November 2009

• Re: comments from Osmosoft on the File API Robin Berjon

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Julian Reschke
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Jonas Sicking
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CORS and HTTP error responses Jeff Walden
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Maciej Stachowiak
• Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Julian Reschke
• Blob as URN was Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API Arun Ranganathan
• [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Arun Ranganathan

Tuesday, 17 November 2009

• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Interface; deadline 8 December 2009 Marcos Caceres
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType Arun Ranganathan
• Re: more flexible ABNF for STS? Julian Reschke
• Re: comments from Osmosoft on the File API Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Darin Fisher
• [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (1) Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Interface; deadline 8 December 2009 Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Interface; deadline 8 December 2009 Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] Interface published Marcos Caceres
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Anne van Kesteren
• [cssom-view] caretPositionFromPoint() and views Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CORS and HTTP error responses Robert O'Callahan
• Re: CORS and HTTP error responses Anne van Kesteren
• [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API Marcin Hanclik
• CORS and HTTP error responses Robert O'Callahan

Monday, 16 November 2009

• Re: [FileAPI] FileReader constants Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] FileReader constants Jonas Sicking
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Tyler Close
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? Tyler Close
• Fwd: [office] Public Review of OpenDocument Version 1.2 Doug Schepers
• [XHR2] Redirects (was: Re: [whatwg] unexpected use of the CORS specification) Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [FileAPI] File.mediaType Marcin Hanclik
• RE: [FileAPI] File.mediaType Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [FileAPI] FileReader constants Anne van Kesteren

Saturday, 14 November 2009

• [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases Scott Wilson
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite Marcos Caceres
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? Devdatta

Friday, 13 November 2009

• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? Tyler Close
• [widgets] Apple, excludes 2 patent applications on Widgets 1.0: Access Requests Policy spec Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments Steffen Krüssel
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments Simon Pieters
• [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments Steffen Krüssel
• Re: [FileAPI] File.name Arun Ranganathan
• Work on Read before/separtely from Write? (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [FileAPI] FileReader constants Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType Arun Ranganathan
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Arun Ranganathan
• [widgets] About the test suite Cyril Concolato
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Jonas Sicking
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)

Thursday, 12 November 2009

• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcos Caceres
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [XHR2] timeout Anne van Kesteren
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 12 November 2009 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcos Caceres
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November Arthur Barstow
• RE: [fileapi] urn -> URL paul.downey@bt.com
• Summary of Media Annotations WG 5th F2F in Santa Clara Joakim Söderberg
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Jonas Sicking
• Re: STS and lockCA Gervase Markham
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely イアンフェッティ
• Re: STS and lockCA Gervase Markham
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Adam Barth
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Jonas Sicking
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely イアンフェッティ
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Jonas Sicking
• DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: STS and lockCA Adam Barth
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? Devdatta
• Re: [fileapi] urn -> URL Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [fileapi] urn -> URL Julian Reschke
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Maciej Stachowiak

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Eric Uhrhane
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Eric Uhrhane
• [widgets] Conformance testing results Marcos Caceres
• Re: STS and lockCA Bil Corry
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Frederick Hirsch
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 12 November 2009 VC Arthur Barstow
• Re: STS and lockCA Gervase Markham
• Re: comments from Osmosoft on the File API Arthur Barstow
• comments from Osmosoft on the File API paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: [FileAPI] File.name Anne van Kesteren
• Re: STS and lockCA Devdatta
• Re: STS and lockCA Adam Barth
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Jonas Sicking
• Re: STS and lockCA Bil Corry
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November Sam Weinig
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [FileAPI] File.name Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Arun Ranganathan
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

• Re: [XHR2] timeout Jonas Sicking
• CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Ian Hickson
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Ian Hickson
• Re: WebSimpleDB object caching Kris Zyp
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? Adam Barth
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? Tyler Close
• Re: CORS Background slides Tyler Close
• Re: [XHR2] timeout Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] timeout Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] FileReader Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [XHR2] timeout Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] timeout Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType Anne van Kesteren
• [FileAPI] FileReader Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [FileAPI] FileReader constants Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

• [FileAPI] File.mediaType Anne van Kesteren
• [FileAPI] File.name Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Dominique Hazael-Massieux

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

• [XHR2] timeout Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

• Re: XMLHttpRequest: Last Call? Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: XMLHttpRequest: Last Call? Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

• XMLHttpRequest: Last Call? Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)

Wednesday, 11 November 2009

• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Marcos Caceres
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Robin Berjon
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Robin Berjon
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Adam Barth
• Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Constrained specification of Icon element Ola Andersson
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification Bil Corry
• Re: WebSimpleDB object caching Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Maciej Stachowiak

Monday, 9 November 2009

• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? Nikunj R. Mehta
• RE: Caching breakout session at TPAC Mike Wilson
• Re: Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24 ( LC-2255) Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Ian Hickson
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
• Re: CORS Background slides Tyler Close
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache Drew Wilson
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache Michael Nordman
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache Alexey Proskuryakov
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? Jonas Sicking
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Robin Berjon
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Adam Barth
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Marcos Caceres
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Robin Berjon
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Sam Weinig
• Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification Collin Jackson
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [widgets] Interface: license attribute, was Re: [Widget: Warp] - license attribute Arthur Barstow
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Robert O'Callahan
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Robert O'Callahan
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Marcos Caceres
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Robin Berjon
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Robin Berjon
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Robin Berjon
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Robert O'Callahan
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Jonas Sicking
• Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification Bil Corry
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Maciej Stachowiak
• Fwd: Caching breakout session at TPAC Nikunj R. Mehta

Sunday, 8 November 2009

• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Jonas Sicking
• What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] Arthur Barstow
• WebSimpleDB object caching Kris Zyp

Saturday, 7 November 2009

• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache Drew Wilson
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache Michael Nordman
• TPAC report day 2 Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache Michael Nordman
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache Drew Wilson
• [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)

Friday, 6 November 2009

• Re: Constrained specification of Icon element Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Definition of Instance was: Comments on Section 6 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] Interface: license attribute, was Re: [Widget: Warp] - license attribute Marcos Caceres
• Re: FW: Viewmode related issues Marcos Caceres
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? Adam Barth
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Devdatta
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Tyler Close

Thursday, 5 November 2009

• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Eric Uhrhane
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Eric Uhrhane
• Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: bug in example Ian Hickson
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? Tyler Close
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Ian Hickson
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Ian Hickson
• RE: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Ian Hickson
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Michael Nordman
• [CORS] ISSUE-108: confused deputy problem Arthur Barstow
• CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? Adam Barth
• bug in example 余仕斌
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: CORS Background slides Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CORS Background slides Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CORS Background slides Jonas Sicking
• Re: CORS Background slides Jonas Sicking
• Re: CORS Background slides Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Jonas Sicking
• Re: CORS Background slides Tyler Close
• Re: CORS Background slides Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CORS Background slides Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CORS Background slides Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CORS Background slides Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Arun Ranganathan
• Re: CORS Background slides Tyler Close

Wednesday, 4 November 2009

• Selectors API 2 Status Lachlan Hunt
• Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] Call for comments on pre-LC#2 of TWI spec; deadline 11 November Arthur Barstow
• Re: More CORS Tuesday afternoon... Adam Barth
• [widgets]: Reminder: Request for Comments: 8-Oct-2009 LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs; deadline 10 November Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 3 November 2009 f2f meeting Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 2 November 2009 f2f meeting Arthur Barstow
• CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Tyler Close
• [Widget: Warp] - license attribute SUZANNE Benoit RD-SIRP-ISS
• CORS Background slides Maciej Stachowiak
• OAuth protocol flow diagrams =JeffH

Tuesday, 3 November 2009

• Multitouch @TPCA 16:30-17:00 Charles McCathieNevile
• FW: OMTP BONDI 1.1 Candidate Release now available David Rogers
• Re: TransAnn: LCWD#3 of Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration published 29 October Marcos Caceres
• ISSUE-110 (code-point conversion): Should we remove the code-point conversion from the D3E spec? [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Adrian Bateman
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Arun Ranganathan
• RE: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Adrian Bateman
• [widgets] Definition of Instance was: Comments on Section 6 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: More CORS Tuesday afternoon... Adam Barth
• Re: More CORS Tuesday afternoon... Maciej Stachowiak
• [WARP] local addresses, UPnP, comments Marcin Hanclik
• Re: More CORS Tuesday afternoon... Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Adding a note to DOM2 Views Ian Jacobs
• Seeking Comments on LCWD of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies; 6 November deadline Arthur Barstow
• Re: Web Data APIs Kris Zyp
• Adding a note to DOM2 Views Anne van Kesteren
• Re: More CORS Tuesday afternoon... Adam Barth
• Re: Web Data APIs Jonas Sicking
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Jonas Sicking
• Viewmode related issues Magnus Olsson
• Constrained specification of Icon element Magnus Olsson
• [widgets] Call for comments on pre-LC#2 of WARP spec; deadline 18 November Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WARP] IRI normalization only for HTTP*? Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [WARP] IRI normalization only for HTTP*? Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• WebApps' publication "plans" Arthur Barstow
• TPAC first day... Charles McCathieNevile
• More CORS Tuesday afternoon... Charles McCathieNevile
• [widgets] View modes security considerations David Rogers
• [WARP] Comments to WARP spec SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)

Monday, 2 November 2009

• Re: Web Data APIs Jeremy Orlow
• ISSUE-108: confused deputy problem [CORS] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Web Data APIs Nikunj R. Mehta
• Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely Doug Schepers
• RE: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Adrian Bateman
• [fileapi] urn -> URL Anne van Kesteren

Sunday, 1 November 2009

• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Marcos Caceres
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Marcos Caceres
• Re: FW: [widgets] viewmodes spec Marcos Caceres
• Travel Notification: Expect Delayed Responses Doug Schepers

Saturday, 31 October 2009

• Web Data APIs Pablo Castro

Friday, 30 October 2009

• Changes to DOM3 Events Key Identifiers Doug Schepers

Thursday, 29 October 2009

• Next-generation file API use cases Eric Uhrhane
• RE: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session David Rogers
• Re: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session David Rogers
• Re: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session Arthur Barstow
• Re: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session Frederick Hirsch
• RE: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session David Rogers
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 29 October 2009 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL Scott Wilson
• Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session Frederick Hirsch
• CORS: Monday Nov 2 13:30-15:00? [Was: Re: TPAC agenda - APIs] Arthur Barstow
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs Robin Berjon
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Julian Reschke
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs Jonas Sicking
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 28 October 2009

• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Arun Ranganathan
• [widgets] Media Type Registration for application/widget Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 29 October 2009 voice conference; TIME CHANGE FOR US Participants Marcos Caceres
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 29 October 2009 voice conference; TIME CHANGE FOR US Participants Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 29 October 2009 voice conference; TIME CHANGE FOR US Participants Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Comments on LCWD #3 Marcos Caceres
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs Maciej Stachowiak
• [EventSource] Comments to the current draft SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
• RE: TPAC agenda - APIs SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
• Re: FW: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification Adam Barth
• Re: [widgets] Comments on LCWD #3 Cyril Concolato
• FW: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification Eric Lawrence

Tuesday, 27 October 2009

• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Ian Hickson
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Ian Hickson
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Arun Ranganathan
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Arun Ranganathan
• [widgets] P&C Last Call 3 Marcos Caceres
• Fwd: Rich Web Application Backplane XG Final Report Published Arthur Barstow
• RE: [Widgets] Security Considerations Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [Widgets] Security Considerations Marcos Caceres
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [Widgets] Security Considerations Marcin Hanclik
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [WARP] UPnP & LAN Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [widgets] Security Guidelines for Widgets? [Was: Re: [widgets] viewmodes spec] Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] Security Guidelines for Widgets? [Was: Re: [widgets] viewmodes spec] Arthur Barstow
• [WARP] UPnP & LAN Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Anne van Kesteren
• TPAC agenda - APIs Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Ian Hickson
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Jonas Sicking
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Ian Hickson

Monday, 26 October 2009

• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Jonas Sicking
• [Widgets] Security Considerations Marcos Caceres
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Jon Ferraiolo
• Re: [widgets] Comments on LCWD #3 Marcos Caceres
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Anne van Kesteren
• [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft Arun Ranganathan
• FW: [widgets] viewmodes spec David Rogers

Sunday, 25 October 2009

• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Michael Nordman
• [widgets] Comments on LCWD #3 Cyril Concolato
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Ian Hickson

Saturday, 24 October 2009

• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Michael Nordman
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Doug Schepers
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Maciej Stachowiak
• CORS Best PRactices (was: [cors] unaddressed security concerns) Doug Schepers
• Re: Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24 ( LC-2255) Adam Barth
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Adam Barth
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Adam Barth
• Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec? Arthur Barstow
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Kris Zyp
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Doug Schepers
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns David-Sarah Hopwood
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns David-Sarah Hopwood
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Doug Schepers
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Adam Barth
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Ian Hickson
• Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24 ( LC-2255) David-Sarah Hopwood
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Jonas Sicking
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Jonas Sicking
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Doug Schepers

Friday, 23 October 2009

• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events Michael Nordman
• Value of Server-Sent Events Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October Arthur Barstow
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Jonathan Rees
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October イアンフェッティ
• RE: Multimodal Interaction WG questions for WebApps (especially WebAPI) Deborah Dahl
• Re: Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24 ( LC-2255) mzurko@us.ibm.com
• Re: Multimodal Interaction WG questions for WebApps (especially WebAPI) Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Multimodal Interaction WG questions for WebApps (especially WebAPI) Deborah Dahl
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Multimodal Interaction WG questions for WebApps (especially WebAPI) Ingmar.Kliche@telekom.de
• CORS: email from Henry Thompson re "CORS still not getting to closure" Arthur Barstow
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October Robin Berjon
• CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October Arthur Barstow
• Headsup: short CfC to publish new WDs of Web Database, Web Storage, Web Sockets, Web Workers and Server-sent Events to be started Arthur Barstow
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [widgets] CfC to publish LCWD#3 of the Packaging and Configuration spec; deadline 26 October Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File Marcos Caceres
• RE: [widgets] CfC to publish LCWD#3 of the Packaging and Configuration spec; deadline 26 October David Rogers

Thursday, 22 October 2009

• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Doug Schepers
• [widgets] CfC to publish LCWD#3 of the Packaging and Configuration spec; deadline 26 October Arthur Barstow
• RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) Henry S. Thompson
• RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf Marcin Hanclik
• RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File Marcin Hanclik
• RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf David Rogers
• Re: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File Marcos Caceres
• RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File Marcos Caceres
• RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File Marcin Hanclik
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: Implementation of the widget signing spec Kai Hendry
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] viewmodes spec David Rogers

Wednesday, 21 October 2009

• Re: [Bug 7938] SECURITY_ERR when disallowing Database open is inconsistent with QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR for disallowing setItem Ian Hickson
• Implementation of the widget signing spec Andreas Kuehne
• FPWD of API for Media Resource 1.0 published Arthur Barstow
• RE: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Ennals, Robert
• Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec? Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [widgets] Fail on encrypted archive Marcos Caceres
• Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec? Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [Bug 7938] SECURITY_ERR when disallowing Database open is inconsistent with QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR for disallowing setItem Nikunj R. Mehta
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf Arthur Barstow
• Web security bar-BOF during week of 2 November? Arthur Barstow
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) Brian Kardell
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) Brian Kardell
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Brian Kardell
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Brian Kardell
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Brian Kardell
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Brian Kardell
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Brian Kardell
• IETF HyBi BoF Salvatore Loreto
• [Bug 7938] SECURITY_ERR when disallowing Database open is inconsistent with QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR for disallowing setItem bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children Simon Pieters
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Thomas Broyer
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Jonas Sicking
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children Boris Zbarsky
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Robert O'Callahan
• RE: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Ennals, Robert
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) Robert O'Callahan
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Robert O'Callahan
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Ennals, Robert
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Robert O'Callahan
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Ennals, Robert
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children John Resig
• Re: Editor's Response in the proposed process (with particular note of spec diff links) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Jonas Sicking
• Editor's Response in the proposed process (with particular note of spec diff links) Maciej Stachowiak

Tuesday, 20 October 2009

• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Robert O'Callahan
• RE: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Ennals, Robert
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children Doug Schepers
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) [progress] Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) [progress] Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) [progress] Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Darin Fisher
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Darin Fisher
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Test suite questions Marcos Caceres
• Re: Touch and gestures events kari.hiitola@nokia.com
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) [progress] Anne van Kesteren
• [Widgets] Compatibility Matrix for Packaging and Configuration Marcos Caceres
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) [progress] Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Darin Fisher
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) Re: Using progress events for other purposes Anne van Kesteren
• re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() Darin Fisher
• Use cases (appcache, etc) Re: Using progress events for other purposes Charles McCathieNevile
• New Progress events draft: 1.32 Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 19 October 2009

• ISSUE-107 (multi-object end events): End state events in multi-object transactions [Progress Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• focus... Re: Touch and gestures events Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Touch and gestures events João Eiras
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec? John Gregg
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Jeremy Orlow
• solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages Gregg Tavares
• Re: Touch and gestures events Olli Pettay
• Re: [widgets] Step 5 - allowing private use lang tags ; ISSUE-93 Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] Step 5 - allowing private use lang tags Marcos Caceres
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Touch and gestures events João Eiras
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Ian Hickson
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Simon Pieters
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Ian Hickson
• ISSUE-106 (mouse capture): Consider adding mouse capture/release API [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Charles McCathieNevile
• DOM4 Core (was: childElements, childElementCount, and children) Doug Schepers
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Ian Hickson
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Simon Pieters

Sunday, 18 October 2009

• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Ian Hickson
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) John Resig
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) Jonas Sicking
• childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) Doug Schepers

Saturday, 17 October 2009

• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? Doug Schepers
• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? Michael Glavassevich
• CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of DataCache API spec; deadline Oct 24 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? Anne van Kesteren
• [Bug 7938] New: SECURITY_ERR when disallowing Database open is inconsistent with QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR for disallowing setItem bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Friday, 16 October 2009

• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? Doug Schepers
• Re: Touch and gestures events João Eiras
• Re: Touch and gestures events Garrett Smith
• Re: Touch and gestures events Doug Schepers
• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? Michael Glavassevich
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Xiaomei Ji
• DataCache - revised editor's draft available Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: Touch and gestures events kari.hiitola@nokia.com
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Xiaomei Ji
• RE: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2 Mike Wilson
• RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File Marcin Hanclik

Thursday, 15 October 2009

• Re: Touch and gestures events Garrett Smith
• Re: Touch and gestures events João Eiras
• Re: Touch and gestures events kari.hiitola@nokia.com
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 15 October 2009 Voice Conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [selectors api] test suite red values Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [widgets] Fail on encrypted archive Robin Berjon
• [widgets] Fail on encrypted archive Marcos Caceres
• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Robin Berjon

Wednesday, 14 October 2009

• Re: Touch and gestures events Kartikaya Gupta
• Re: Touch and gestures events Maciej Stachowiak
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 15 October 2009 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: Touch and gestures events Olli Pettay
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Touch and gestures events Garrett Smith
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Mark S. Miller

Tuesday, 13 October 2009

• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Dan Brickley
• Re: Open Review of the CORS Specification Doug Schepers
• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Felix Sasaki
• Re: Open Review of the CORS Specification Mark S. Miller
• RE: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Tran, Dzung D
• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Dan Brickley
• RE: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Tran, Dzung D
• Re: Accept header setting in XHR Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Accept header setting in XHR Peter Michaux
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Arthur Barstow
• Re: [public-webapps] <none> Marcos Caceres
• Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors Ian Hickson
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Adam Barth
• Re: Resending Re: WebStorage and WebDatabase - creation and exceptions Ian Hickson
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Mark S. Miller

Saturday, 10 October 2009

• seeking an editor for "Web DOM Core" draft Michael(tm) Smith

Monday, 12 October 2009

• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File Marcos Caceres
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Xiaomei Ji
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements Marcos Caceres
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements Robin Berjon
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Jonathan Rees
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR] Request charset is limited to UTF-8 for x-www-form-urlencoded data Yaroslav
• Re: [XHR] Request charset is limited to UTF-8 for x-www-form-urlencoded data Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Anne van Kesteren

Saturday, 10 October 2009

• [public-webapps] <none> Larry Masinter
• [widgets] CfC: Change request for classes of products; deadline October 14 Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] CfC: Remove the "At Risk" designation for the its:dir; deadline October 14 Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] CfC: Dropping xml:lang on icon elements; deadline Oct 14 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header Boris Zbarsky

Friday, 9 October 2009

• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns Mark S. Miller
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements Marcos Caceres
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Xiaomei Ji
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements Robin Berjon
• File API comments Julian Reschke
• [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements Marcos Caceres
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: File API commens Jonas Sicking
• Re: File API commens Ian Hickson

Thursday, 8 October 2009

• Request for Comments: 8-Oct-2009 LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs; deadline 10 November Arthur Barstow
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Olli Pettay
• propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) Xiaomei Ji
• Re: File API commens Arun Ranganathan
• Re: File API commens Jonas Sicking
• [widgets] Patent Advisory Group for Widgets 1.0 Updates spec published Recommendations Arthur Barstow
• Re: File API commens Julian Reschke
• Re: File API commens Jonas Sicking
• Re: File API commens Anne van Kesteren
• Re: File API commens Julian Reschke
• Re: File API commens Jonas Sicking
• [cors] unaddressed security concerns Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Joakim Söderberg
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) Mark S. Miller
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility Mark S. Miller
• Re: [XHR] Last Call comment on about dependencies Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not Marcos Caceres
• Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Accept header setting in XHR Anne van Kesteren
• [widgets] Draft minutes for 8 October 2009 Voice Conf Arthur Barstow
• File API commens Julian Reschke
• Re: Widget DigSign: Example of a distributor signature document is buggy Frederick Hirsch
• Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors Per-Erik Brodin
• Re: Widget DigSign: Example of a distributor signature document is buggy Kai Hendry
• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Shumpei Shiraishi
• Re: [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter Cameron McCormack

Wednesday, 7 October 2009

• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Robin Berjon
• Re: PFWG comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration Last Call (late, very late) Arthur Barstow
• Re: PFWG comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration Last Call (late, very late) Michael Cooper
• Re: Widget DigSign: Example of a distributor signature document is buggy Frederick Hirsch
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not Arthur Barstow
• Fwd: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 8 October 2009 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not Arthur Barstow
• RE: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing Stephen Jolly
• RE: HTML5: has input device: use motion detection been included? David Rogers
• Date/time types in Web IDL Chris Poppe
• Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? Shumpei Shiraishi
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published Marcos Caceres
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives Jonas Sicking
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives Garrett Smith
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives Jonas Sicking
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives Garrett Smith
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives Jonas Sicking
• File API proposal - marrying two alternatives Nikunj R. Mehta

Tuesday, 6 October 2009

• Request for Feedback: LCWD of Mobile Web Application Best Practices; deadline November 6 Arthur Barstow
• Widget DigSign: Example of a distributor signature document is buggy Breitschwerdt, Christian, VF-Group
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] P&C: Step 8 bug when custom start file is bogus Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] P&C: remove MAY and OPTIONAL assertions? Marcos Caceres

Monday, 5 October 2009

• Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors Jonas Sicking
• Re: [cors] update (oct5) Arthur Barstow
• [cors] update (oct5) Anne van Kesteren
• [VMMF] Comments (1) Marcin Hanclik
• [widgets] P&C: remove MAY and OPTIONAL assertions? Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] P&C: Step 8 bug when custom start file is bogus Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com
• [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing Phil Archer
• RE: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Marcin Hanclik
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Robin Berjon
• Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors Ian Hickson
• RE: View modes: more precision on fullscreen Marcin Hanclik
• View modes: more precision on fullscreen Robin Berjon

Saturday, 3 October 2009

• Re: PFWG comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration Last Call (late, very late) Marcos Caceres
• Re: STS and lockCA Gervase Markham

Friday, 2 October 2009

• RE: STS and lockCA Hodges, Jeff
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method Jonas Sicking
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method Jonas Sicking
• Re: STS and lockCA Adam Barth
• Re: ISSUE-95: P&C CR: Conformance checker behavior intermixed with UA behavior [Widgets] Marcos Caceres
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method Darin Fisher
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method Arun Ranganathan
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method Darin Fisher
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method Arun Ranganathan
• Re: ISSUE-95: P&C CR: Conformance checker behavior intermixed with UA behavior [Widgets] Arthur Barstow
• RE: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization Marcos Caceres
• RE: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization Marcin Hanclik
• [widgets] Test suite Marcos Caceres
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method Olli Pettay
• Re: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing Scott Wilson
• Comment on File API's FileData::slice method Darin Fisher
• Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization Marcos Caceres

Thursday, 1 October 2009

• RE: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Web IDL and the New Scripting Coordination List Doug Schepers
• STS and lockCA Gervase Markham
• Web IDL and the New Scripting Coordination List Arthur Barstow
• RE: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization Marcin Hanclik
• Issue with semantics of the access element in WARP Stephen Jolly
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 1 October 2009 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
• RE: Comments on View Modes Media Feature ED Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [widgets] Closing widget Interface issues Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2 Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2 Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (1) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2 Marcos Caceres
• Re: Please don't call your API "simple" Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2 Robin Berjon
• Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization Marcos Caceres

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 December 2009 07:10:17 UTC