- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:15:51 -0800
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
e: > 4) ** EDITORIAL RE OTHER SCHEME ** > > "In fact, it is possible that both this scheme and another defined to access Zip archive content would be used jointly, with little or no overlap in functionality." > > Without any other context, this is incomprehensible. > > Suggestion: remove sentence. Fair enough. The entire section has been removed. I looked for a version of the document in which the entire section has been removed. It's still there in http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-uri/, and the "Latest Editor's Draft" link supplied is 404 Not Found. If you respond to review comments with a claim that the comment has resulted in an edit to the reviewed documents, it would be reasonable to supply a valid pointer to a document which contains the edits? Larry -- http://larry.masinter.net
Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:18:24 UTC