- From: Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:57:46 -0800
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <fa2eab050911050957k1db57c45ye3936ca20aaecf91@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>wrote: > > On Nov 4, 2009, at 8:42 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > I know we had this conversation before, and I'm not even sure which >> side of the issue I was on at the time, but given the amount of >> confusion at the TPAC meeting yesterday, I think we should consider >> renaming the "Web Database" spec. >> > > I am glad you recognize this issue now (noting that I raised this point in > July [1] when. At that time we proposed that this spec be called SQLDatabase > or WebSQLDatabase. > > > >> It seems clear at this point that the API will in all likelyhood >> forever be SQL based, so I propose that we include SQL somewhere in >> the name, for example "Web SQL Database" or some such. >> > > I would support this name change. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/mid/D34DA34B-3ED7-4D65-9ECB-C9A7BFF3110F@oracle.com > > > / Jonas >> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> >> wrote: >> >>> As noted on 23 October [1], the following "HTML5 APIs" are ready or very >>> close to being ready for Last Call Working Draft (LC): >>> >>> 1. Server-Sent Events >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ >>> >>> 2. Web Database >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ >>> >>> 3. Web Sockets API >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/ >>> >>> 4. Web Storage >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/ >>> >>> 5. Web Workers >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/ >>> >>> Please submit comments about these specs by 19 November. >>> >>> Note the Process Document states the following regarding the >>> significance/meaning of LCWD: >>> >>> [[ >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call >>> Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that: >>> >>> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant technical >>> requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) in the >>> Working >>> Draft; >>> >>> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant >>> dependencies >>> with other groups; >>> >>> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these >>> dependencies >>> have been satisfied. >>> In general, a Last Call announcement is also a signal that the Working >>> Group >>> is planning to advance the technical report to later maturity levels. >>> >>> ]] >>> >>> Additionally, a LCWD should be considered feature-complete with all >>> issues >>> resolved; that is, as Chaals noted yesterday, "Last Call means the >>> Working >>> Group considers the work to be good". >>> >>> -Regards, Art Barstow >>> >>> [1] >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0313.html >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > Nikunj > http://o-micron.blogspot.com > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2009 17:58:19 UTC