- From: Xiaomei Ji <xji@chromium.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:27:03 -0700
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Olli@pettay.fi, public-webapps@w3.org, sam@webkit.org, webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
- Message-ID: <a7aebc750910161027p68bdd363hbb84a173b8382eb4@mail.gmail.com>
(sorry for the spam, send last time using the wrong 'from' email address to the public mailing lists) Hi Maciej: Thanks for your comments. I have a question about "interface CaretPosition": In case of form control node, such as <textarea>, the 'offset' is the character offset within the <textarea> under mouse, 'offsetKind' is "control", what is the value of 'containingNode"? Is it itself or its shadowAncestorNode? Thanks, Xiaomei On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2009, at 1:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:04:52 +0200, Xiaomei Ji <xji@chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> Maybe I should propose Document.wordFromPoint() which directly returns >>> the word under the mouse (and handles both the DOM node and non-DOM form >>> control nodes). >>> It hides the information about the node and should be a useful API. >>> >> >> Don't you need at least some context information as well besides just the >> word? Although I suppose you can get that using a combination of >> elementFromPoint and wordFromPoint... >> > > I think we should consider changing caretRangeFromPoint's return type, if > it's not too late. It's useful to get the caret position inside a text form > control, beyond the immediate use case. > > Instead of returning a Range, caretRangeFromPoint could return an object > like this: > > interface CaretPosition { > readonly attribute Node containingNode; > readonly attribute int offset; > readonly attribute DOMString offsetKind; // "document" or "control" > } > > It could have a convenience method for converting a Range too, if that's > really needed (which would give null or something for a control position). > > Regards, > Maciej > > >
Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 17:27:37 UTC