- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:12:32 +0200
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
As no one objected, ITS is no longer a feature at risk. It is the WG recommended solution to this particular i18n problem. Kind regards, Marcos On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: >> On Oct 6, 2009, at 12:46 , Marcos Caceres wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Do we have any evidence at all that it (as defined in the 23-July-2009 >>>> Candidate) either has been implemented or is being implemented? >>> >>> No, we do not have any evidence or commitment of implementation of >>> this feature. >> >> To be fair we haven't had much in the way of public statements about who is >> implementing what parts. I wouldn't take that as a clear indication of >> anything. >> > > Well, I'm not sure what we are supposed to do then. Opera and a few > others are implementing and we are providing implementation feedback > as we go - we've identified bugs as a direct result of implementation. > My understanding is that going to CR is about gaining implementation > experience and providing feedback to improve the spec: to see what can > be realistically implemented. If other people out there are > implementing and not providing feedback, as requested, then I don't > see how we can help them. > > -- > Marcos Caceres > http://datadriven.com.au > -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 14:13:29 UTC