- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:07:10 -0500
- To: ext Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Dec 3, 2009, at 9:23 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: > As predicted last week [1], I have replied to the outstanding > issues that > had been raised on the following specs, and thus am ready to > suggest that > we take these specs to LC to get wider review: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ > http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/ > http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/ > http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/ > http://dev.w3.org/html5/workers/ > > A six month review period should be reasonable, so I would suggest > giving > a last call "deadline" of something like July 1st 2010. Would those that have implemented and/or deployed the above specs please comment on the LC review period length for these specs? If we already have multiple implementations of a spec, I think the spirit of the Recommendation track process suggests a shorter LC period (say 2 months given the time of the year) and then (assuming no substantive comments) moving the spec to Candidate. -Art Barstow
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 12:08:01 UTC