- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:33:11 +0100
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:49:58 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > this is a Call for consensus to request publishing the Selectors API > draft at > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/selectors-api/Overview.html?rev=1.101&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1 > as a Candidate Recommendation (assuming Lachy fixes the apparent > encoding errors, the incorrect URIs and so on as editorial corrections). Given wide support, and no objections, the resolution of the working group is to request publication of the document as a CR. cheers, and thanks chaals > The proposed exit criteria are in a separate thread, but essentially are: > > For a set of tests based on HTML, CSS 2.1 selectors and this spec, there > are two implementations that pass every test interoperably, and do not > fail any "additional" tests based on misimplementing this specification > (i.e. failures based on not supporting a technology used only in the > additional tests, such as MathML, will not be taken into account). > > Note that the test suite has not been agreed by the Working Group, and > will not be required for the transition request. Agreeing on a test > suite will be part of the work we have to do before this spec can move > futher than CR. > > Please respond yes or no before the end of Friday 27 November. Silence > will be taken as assent, but this call will not be considered to result > in a resolution without a "reasonable" level of positive response. > > Cheers > > Chaals > -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 17:33:51 UTC