Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec from Marcos Caceres on 2009-11-12 (public-webapps@w3.org from October to December 2009)

From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:56:11 +0100
To: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
CC: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)" <BS3131@att.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4AFC301B.6080406@opera.com>

Marcin Hanclik wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
> I understand that too many details may not work or be an obstacle in the adoption.
> However, I derive that from the security point of view we still would like to distinguish at least between executable and non-executable content.

I think this is established by the content type, see the SNIFF spec. If 
that is not what you mean, then can you please elaborate.

> The distinction between retrievable and "submissible" touches upon the privacy (at present the users do not complain when they submit any data), but seems to be out of concerns at present.

I don't understand the above.

Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 15:57:02 UTC