- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:48:35 +0100
- To: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hello, I understand from http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-20091029/ that this is the place to direct my feedback on the widget packaging spec, and that I have missed the Last Call deadline by one day. I hope you will consider my plea anyway, since it is based on evaluation of an implementation I only discovered last night. See below for an issue I tried to raise with the implementor. It seems W3C Widget zip packages unload a mess of several files in the current working directory when unzipped. This is unfortunate and I urge you to consider a design that allows things to be kept in a single subdirectory. 1. the dominant convention in modern software development is that you can safely unwrap a .zip or .tar.gz in the current working directory, in the expectation that you'll find only a sensibly named subdirectory. Those who violate this expectation are often seen as making a basic beginners mistake. Encoding such a 'mistake' in a W3C REC both looks bad, and encourages bad practice. 2. by risking a mixup between pre-existing files and those from the archive file, we introduce the risk of confusion and inclarity, making widgets ever slightly harder to learn from. And or those who do try to learn from others works, we reward them by making a mess of their filetree. Assuming 1000 new developers decide each day to explore W3C Widget technology and learn by example, I expect 900+ of them will come with the reasonable assumption that a zip file can be safely unpacked in a directory that has already got other stuff in it (including possibly files with common names like index.html). Mixing up files will be annoying; accidentally overwriting files will be infuriating.... 3. Are we confident that all unzip tools will ask nicely before overwriting existing files? A quick test on my machine at least gave me a warning. eg. TellyClub:~ danbri$ mkdir w3ctest TellyClub:~ danbri$ cd w3ctest/ TellyClub:w3ctest danbri$ echo '<html6>my original valuable html document</>' > index.html TellyClub:w3ctest danbri$ curl -Os http://berjon.com/tmp/a-widget.wgt TellyClub:w3ctest danbri$ unzip a-widget.wgt Archive: a-widget.wgt inflating: config.xml inflating: icon.svg creating: img/ inflating: img/me.jpg replace index.html? [y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename: Thanks for considering my request. cheers, Dan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <widgeon@googlecode.com> Date: Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:24 AM Subject: Re: Issue 4 in widgeon: test widget unzips in current directory To: danbrickley@gmail.com Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 4 by robin.berjon: test widget unzips in current directory http://code.google.com/p/widgeon/issues/detail?id=4 That is something that is imposed on us by the Widgets spec, so you'd have to complain to Marcos I'm afraid. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Received on Friday, 20 November 2009 08:49:08 UTC