- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:29:19 +0200
- To: Yaroslav <yarosla@gmail.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:22:20 +0200, Yaroslav <yarosla@gmail.com> wrote: > In the current spec > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20080415/) I do not see > the possibility to POST application/x-www-form-urlencoded data with > charset other than UTF-8. I think this is limiting factor, which > should be avoided. UTF-8 is good versatile encoding but it is not > always practical to use it. When developing sites in Russian, for > example, we mainly use windows-1251 encoding, UTF-8 is rarely used as > it doubles network traffic. > > The spec says: > >> data is a DOMString >> Encode data using UTF-8 for transmission. >> If a Content-Type header is set using setRequestHeader() set the >> charset parameter of that header to UTF-8. > > In my practice application/x-www-form-urlencoded data usually comes > from custom javascript encoding function (as DOMString). When sending > it to server over XHR I use setRequestHeader('Content-type', > 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=windows-1251'). This > informs the server of the correct encoding. This all worked well until > FF3 followed the spec. > > I think when the user explicitly sets charset with setRequestHeader() > the browser should not override that. UTF-8 should be used only as > default. I don't quite understand how this could actually work given that the DOMString will have to be converted to UTF-8. It seems problems would already arise there. Apologies for the late reply by the way; work on XMLHttpRequest has been semi-dormant for a while awaiting some more feedback before attempting another Last Call. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 09:30:04 UTC