- From: Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:17:52 +0900
- To: "Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>
- Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
"Nikunj R. Mehta" <nikunj.mehta@oracle.com>, 2009-11-30 16:49 -0800: [...] > A generic term could mean something too broad and a specific term might be > arcane. To the extent that the arcane term is the most used for a certain > meaning and can be easily understood by readers with minimal help, the > specific term sounds more useful. Would you agree that it was easy to > understand what ISAM means when you spend 5 minutes reading the Wikipedia > article on ISAM [1]? Sure. But I don't think from that it necessarily follows that having ISAM is the best thing to have in the title. --Mike -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 01:18:01 UTC