Re: Transaction callback for localStorage mutex?

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Adam Barth wrote:
>
> I haven't been following the localStorage mutex discussion in detail, 
> but have we already rejected the idea of having content specifically ask 
> for the mutex via a transaction callback, similar to how web databases 
> work?

One of the limitations is we can't change the API (since it already 
shipped in IE). If we could change the API, it'd be trivial to fix.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 02:25:38 UTC