- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:09:43 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > > > > Cheer up, I can think of _much_ worst things that have popped out of > > > the W3C onto the Web than Web Storage:) > > > > Yeah but they typically have minimal impact on the deployed Web, > > unlike the storage mutex problem. > > So hang on... Why are going to LC if this is such a massive issue? Well from the point of view of the spec, the issue is resolved. It "just" has unfortunate performance implications for multi-process UAs. > Is this issue clearly marked in the spec with a link to at least an > email thread where the problem is described? Not currently; I can add some text if you think that would be useful. I had assumed everyone was pretty much fully aware of the issue. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 14:10:30 UTC