- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:26:02 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >> > >> All we're saying is that urn:uuid represents a specific chunk of data > >> with a specific mimetype. This seems like something that's already there > >> with urn:uuid. > > > > We're also saying that urn:uuid: has special semantics in the same-origin > > model, and that it has an expiration model. > > The expiration model is just that when the Document goes away the > urn:uuid is changed to no longer represent that chunk of data. > > The origin is something that at least in gecko we build on top of the > URI, i.e. the URI itself doesn't contain any origin information. If you > consider it to be part of the URI, then why wouldn't each urn:uuids > already have an origin? I just mean that if someone else decides that they are going to resolve urn:uuid:s in some way or other, the origin model they would use will almost certainly be quite different to the origin model we are using here. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2009 22:26:29 UTC