- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:31:51 -0800
- To: Darin Fisher <darin@chromium.org>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
- Message-id: <DBF2E40C-02BD-4269-AD2B-96D552CD95C8@apple.com>
On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Darin Fisher wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> > wrote: > Yay! > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Anne van Kesteren > <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > >>>> WebKit presently supports sending File. It does not support > FileData > >>>> yet. > >>> > >>> Is Content-Type set to anything specific if the author has not > set it? > >> > >> // FIXME: Should we set a Content-Type if one is not set. > >> > >> ^^^ looks like it presently depends on the web page setting the C- > T header > >> manually :-/ I think that should be fixed to be based on the > system's > >> knowledge of the file's mime type. > > > > So far I have only added support for Blob (the new FileData) of > these two > > and set the Content-Type to application/octet-stream if not > provided by the > > Web author. Should I also add File and set the Content-Type to > > File.mediaType? > > I definitely think so yes. > > Agreed. > > > > Same thing for the send() function. > > On a separate note, is sending "application/octet-stream" really > better than simply sending no Content-Type header at all when sending > a Blob (or a File with empty mediaType)? > > > I think it is probably wise to default to sending a content type > that explicitly says "i don't know the type" on the grounds that > being explicit is better than not. According to HTTP, I think sending no Content-Type more strongly indicates that you don't know the type. In particular, missing content type gives the recipient license to sniff the content. Regards, Maciej
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 20:32:32 UTC