- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:24:23 +0100
- To: cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Cyril Concolato wrote: > Hi, > > Le 15/12/2009 18:00, Marcos Caceres a écrit : >> Hi Cyril >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Cyril Concolato >> <cyril.concolato@enst.fr> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> In the test suite, the test br.wgt leads to a widget with no valid start >>> file. I think this should be considered an invalid widget because a >>> Widget >>> UA will not be able to display it, the user may see an icon but nothing >>> happening when activating it. WDYT ? >>> >> >> Looking at the test description from the test suite: >> >> "br.wgt (source files) >> Tests the UA's ability to ignore subsequent repetitions of the content >> element. To pass, the widget start file must treated by the user agent >> as an invalid widget. " > My mistake, I must have misread with one of the above or below > example... BTW, maybe you can improve the sentence: > "Tests the UA's ability to ignore subsequent repetitions of the content > element. To pass, the widget must *be* treated by the user agent as an > invalid widget." > remove 'start file' and add 'be' Fixed.
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:24:58 UTC