- From: Kenton Varda <kenton@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:58:18 -0800
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4112ecad0912180058w6950b1f3u5f083cf32d1155a1@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Kenton Varda wrote: > > > > With the right capability-based infrastructure, the capability-based > > solution would be trivial too. We don't have this infrastructure. > > This is a valid concern. > > It's not so much that we don't have one, so much as nobody is proposing > one... I'd be happy if there was a concrete proposal on the table that > made things as simple as CORS, supported the Web's key use cases as > easily, and that the browser vendors were all ready to implement. > I hope to work on that. A lot of it is more a question of software than standards -- e.g. having a web server which provides easy access to capability-based design patterns. > > You probably also question the effect of my solution on caching, or > > other technical issues like that. I could explain how I'd deal with > > them, but then you'd find finer details to complain about, and so on. > > If you're saying that a caps-based infrastructure would have insoluable > problems, then that makes it a non-starter. No, I think all the problems are solvable, but the time we might spend debating them is unbounded. > If not, then someone who > thinks this is the right way to go should write up the spec on how to do > it, and we should iterate it until all the finer details are fixed, just > like we do with all specs. > > > > I'm not sure the conversation would benefit anyone, so let's call it a > > draw. > > I'm not in this to win arguments, I'm in this to improve the Web. I'd be > more than happy to "lose" if we got something out of it that didn't have > technical problems. If there's no concrete proposal on the table that > makes things as simple as CORS, supports the Web's key use cases as > easily, and that the browser vendors are all ready to implement, then the > conversation can indeed not benefit anyone. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' >
Received on Friday, 18 December 2009 08:59:13 UTC