- From: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 06:37:02 -0400
- To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:34 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Arthur Barstow > <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> Marcsos, All, - given the next publication of the widgets P&C spec >> will be a >> LCWD, should the feature at risk stuff (its:dir) be deleted? >> > > I don't know :( I think we should remove the at risk, and just run > with it. It's still going to be optional, but at least it provides a > solution for those that need it. > > The other way forward is that we remove ITS, make a new spec that > defines our own @dir and <span> elements in the widget namespace. I've > put that idea to the group before and didn't get a very positive > response. My only personal gripe with ITS is that it requires another > namespace. That's a pain for both developers and implementers. But, I > can live with it. Do we have any evidence at all that it (as defined in the 23- July-2009 Candidate) either has been implemented or is being implemented? -Regards, Art Barstow
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 10:38:32 UTC