- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:24:26 -0800
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > this is a Call for consensus to request publishing the Selectors API draft > at > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/selectors-api/Overview.html?rev=1.101&content-type=text/html;%20charset=iso-8859-1 > as a Candidate Recommendation (assuming Lachy fixes the apparent encoding > errors, the incorrect URIs and so on as editorial corrections). > > The proposed exit criteria are in a separate thread, but essentially are: > > For a set of tests based on HTML, CSS 2.1 selectors and this spec, there are > two implementations that pass every test interoperably, and do not fail any > "additional" tests based on misimplementing this specification (i.e. > failures based on not supporting a technology used only in the additional > tests, such as MathML, will not be taken into account). > > Note that the test suite has not been agreed by the Working Group, and will > not be required for the transition request. Agreeing on a test suite will be > part of the work we have to do before this spec can move futher than CR. > > Please respond yes or no before the end of Friday 27 November. Silence will > be taken as assent, but this call will not be considered to result in a > resolution without a "reasonable" level of positive response. I support this publication. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:25:26 UTC