- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:12:40 +0100
- To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)" <BS3131@att.com>, "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:45:17 +0100, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) <BS3131@att.com> wrote: > Hi Charles, > I have an agenda item for the AOB section or wherever it can fit. I will > be spending most of the time with DAP and part with Webapps (Widgets), > but will try to balance the agendas to be in the APIs meeting as much as > possible. > > The basic question I have is what is the relationship of the following > specs to the HTML5 "package" (being normatively referenced by HTML5). Is > it expected that they will reach LCWD stage along with HTML5? ... Thisis effectively in a "future plans" session (the final session of the meeting). But it is expected that most of them will reach last call quite soon - for a couple of them the editor already thinks they are ready (but we will put it to the group first...). > - Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) > - Server-Sent Events > - Web Sockets > - Web Workers The database (or offline storeage or whatever you want to call it) specs will be discussed as a block in the existing agenda. > These are not normatively referenced by HTML5: > - Web Database > - WebSimpleDB API > > There does not seem to be a lot of discussion on some of these specs, > although there are periodic updates. Is there expected to be a period of > more active group discussion prior to LCWD for those that have been > moving along more quietly? Presumably. There will in any case be a call for consensus before that happens - which is a trigger to start discussion if you think it is warranted. (I can't force the group to discuss things - that's up to the individual members of the group). cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Thursday, 29 October 2009 06:13:17 UTC