Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December

Marcin Hanclik wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
>
>>> You once accused us of being a kindergarten, and now you are asking us
>>> to willfully violate the process?
> Well :), I do not want to remember those multi-context discussions.
>
>>> We have already aligned.
> Thanks.
>
>>> Maybe... I recommend that you formally re-raise the local pattern
>>> issues once we publish LC#2 or continue working on your new spec
>>> (which Opera supports, btw)... but please, remove all duplicate text
>>> and keep is short, as Robin suggested.
> Ok, I will re-raise in LC#2 or discuss how to bring them back a kind of automatically.
> The delta spec will be short.
>

Long specs suck.... The shorter the better; everyone hates reading specs 
(specially me, unless they have pictures... which I like). However, 
something tell me we are underestimating the complexity of this whole 
"local" service discovery thing and the spec you are proposing will grow 
into a little beast of it's own :)

Received on Thursday, 3 December 2009 13:30:08 UTC