- From: John Resig <jeresig@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:32:20 -0400
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, "www-dom@w3.org list" <www-dom@w3.org>
> I don't feel too strongly about having both .children and .childElements, > but I do think that .children is a little problematic for authors... they > will always have to check to see if Comment nodes are included, because of > the large marketshare for older versions of IE, while .childElements allows > them to write simple, clean, efficient code, which is the whole point of an > element-based API. That's not completely true - if a code base were to make use of .children for efficiency it would probably write code like the following: var getChildren = (function(){ var div = document.createElement("div"); div.innerHTML = "<!--div-->"; if ( div.children && div.children.length === 0 ) { return function(elem){ return elem.children; }; } else { return function(elem){ var ret = [], child = elem.children || elem.childNodes; for ( var i = 0, l = child.length; i < l; i++ ) { if ( child[i].nodeType === 1 ) { ret.push( child[i] ); } } return ret; }; } })(); That way they'd have one clean function for .children in browsers that handle it nicely and another for ones that don't. In comparison, the following is a sample of the code that would need to exist to use .childElements var getChildren = (function(){ if ( document.documentElement.childElements ) { return function(elem){ return elem.childElements; }; } else { return function(elem){ var ret = [], child = elem.children || elem.childNodes; for ( var i = 0, l = child.length; i < l; i++ ) { if ( child[i].nodeType === 1 ) { ret.push( child[i] ); } } return ret; }; } })(); In the end, not much of a change - at least not enough to warrant a completely new property. (Note: The above code aggregates an array of DOM elements, it's likely that you would want to avoid the extra loop in a high performance situation. Also, elem.children || elem.childNodes is used to get a minor perf boost in IE, since it'll have to search through less nodes. Also, if .childElements did exist it's likely that some code bases would start to have an if ( childElements ) {} else if ( children ) {} else {} - which wouldn't make a ton of sense if IE never implements the new property.) --John
Received on Wednesday, 21 October 2009 01:33:23 UTC