- From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:08:32 +0100
- To: marcosc@opera.com
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi, Le 15/12/2009 18:00, Marcos Caceres a écrit : > Hi Cyril > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Cyril Concolato > <cyril.concolato@enst.fr> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In the test suite, the test br.wgt leads to a widget with no valid start >> file. I think this should be considered an invalid widget because a Widget >> UA will not be able to display it, the user may see an icon but nothing >> happening when activating it. WDYT ? >> > > Looking at the test description from the test suite: > > "br.wgt (source files) > Tests the UA's ability to ignore subsequent repetitions of the content > element. To pass, the widget start file must treated by the user agent > as an invalid widget. " My mistake, I must have misread with one of the above or below example... BTW, maybe you can improve the sentence: "Tests the UA's ability to ignore subsequent repetitions of the content element. To pass, the widget must *be* treated by the user agent as an invalid widget." remove 'start file' and add 'be' Cyril > > So yes, it is required to be treated as invalid? > > I checked the config.xml and it seem to be ok? : > > <widget xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets"> > <name>br</name> > <content/> > <content src="fail.html"/> > </widget> > > -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 2009 17:08:55 UTC