- From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:52:10 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: marcosc@opera.com, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Robin, Robin Berjon a écrit : > On Nov 14, 2009, at 04:30 , Marcos Caceres wrote: >>> Also, we are working on an implementation of the widget spec but we don't >>> have support for HTML, only SVG. The tests are currently designed with HTML >>> start files. Would it be possible to have alternative versions with SVG >>> start files ? >> Sure! I'm happy to include that. However, I will need your help to >> make that happen. If you can commit some time, then we can talk about >> how we get SVG as a standard part of the test suite. WDYT? > > That should actually be reasonably trivial. Most of the HTML documents in the test suite are the same green/red/grey documents. It's easy to make the same in SVG, and then replace all the HTML documents with the same hash with their corresponding SVGs, renaming the .html in the config files. That should leave a few to change manually, but nothing horrible. Yes I agree, that should not be difficult, I've already manually created the green/red SVG files. But I was wondering about the order given in the default start files table. For example, if a widget package contains both a index.htm and index.svg, is the UA required to use index.htm ? If this is the case we need to duplicate the tests. If not, we can add the SVG files and use a single test (for most cases). Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://tsi.enst.fr/~concolat
Received on Friday, 20 November 2009 08:52:43 UTC