- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:52:14 -0400
- To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Below is the draft agenda for the October 8 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion before the VC on all of the agenda topics via public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting). Please address Open/Raised Issues and Open Actions before the meeting: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/8 Minutes from the last VC: http://www.w3.org/2009/10/01-wam-minutes.html -Regards, Art Barstow Logistics: Time: 22:00 Tokyo; 16:00 Helsinki; 15:00 Paris; 14:00 London; 09:00 Boston; 06:00 Seattle Duration = 90 minutes Zakim Bridge = +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99 or +44.117.370.6152 PIN = 9231 ("WAF1"); IRC channel = #wam; irc://irc.w3.org:6665 Confidentiality of minutes = Public Agenda: 1. Review and tweak agenda 2. Announcements 3. Packaging and Configuration spec http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/Overview_TSE.html a. Issue #88: Widgets, what happens to preferences if the UA swaps locales? http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/88 b. Issue #93: deprecated, grandfathered, and redundant tags should be skipped http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/93 c. What to do about its:dir? Options include: remove before LC#3; remove before CR#2; move it to a new spec; keep it in the spec. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/ 0043.html d. Need normative statement of Mandatory vs. Optional attributes? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/ 0072.html e. Remove MAY and OPTIONAL assertions or make non-normative? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/ 0046.html f. Proposal to publish FPWD of the P&C Conformance Checker spec: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-pc-cc/Overview.src.html 4. Widget Interface spec http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/ a. Status of LC comment processing http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42538/WD-widgets- apis-20090818/ b. Is the spec testable as is e.g. the assertions clear and extractable (as is the case with the P&C TSE)? c. What needs to be done before publishing LC#2? 5. Access Requests Policy (WARP) spec http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-access/ a. Change the name of the "uri" attribute? Scott: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/ 2009OctDec/0019.html Phil: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/ 0042.html b. Issue with semantics of the access element in WARP by Stephen Jolly http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/ 0011.html 6. View Modes Media Features spec: FPWD is out; definitions need work: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/ 7. Updates spec: plan for next publication http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-updates/ 8. URI spec: besides TAG, what groups should we ask to review the 8- Oct-2009 LCWD? http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/waf/widgets-uri/Overview-LC.html 9. Requirements doc: how far out of sync is it with our formal pubs and what needs to be done to align it? Publishing plan. http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/ 9. AOB
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 12:53:15 UTC