- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:07:53 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Dumitru Daniliuc <dumi@chromium.org>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Dumitru Daniliuc wrote: > > When talking about statement error callbacks (point #6, section 4.3.2), the > spec says: > 1. If the error callback returns false, then move on to the next statement, > if any, or onto the next overall step otherwise. > 2. Otherwise, the error callback did not return false, or there was no error > callback. Jump to the last step in the overall steps. > > What should happen if the callback doesn't return anything (undefined)? > Should we jump to the transaction error callback? Can/should we clarify this > in the spec too? If it doesn't return false, then the second step you quote above (numbered 3 in the spec) applies, no? I don't understand how this is unclear. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 02:08:28 UTC