- From: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 09:46:47 -0400
- To: "marcosc@opera.com" <marcosc@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:25 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > (Apologies up front, the following is going to to seem like a rather > dumb and slightly condescending discussion. I honestly do not mean it > to be, but its necessary to help me identify where I need to fix the > specification. Please bear with me.) LOL! > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Arthur Barstow > <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> Since the schema and Authoring guidelines are both non-normative, >> the P+C >> spec is not clear if an element's attributes are required or not. > > When you say "required" (passive voice), do you mean: My expectation is the spec will normatively state whether an element's attributes (e.g. <widget> element has id, version, etc.) are required or not in a configuration document. I think this information is clear in the 23-July-2009 CR but it is not clear in the TSE where the required information is embedded in non-normative Authoring Guidelines. -Regards, Art Barstow
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 13:48:11 UTC