- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:01:09 -0800
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Dec 4, 2009, at 4:19 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> >> If we already have multiple implementations of a spec, I think the >> spirit of the Recommendation track process suggests a shorter LC >> period >> (say 2 months given the time of the year) and then (assuming no >> substantive comments) moving the spec to Candidate. > > I don't realistically think I'd have time to address the likely > volume of > comments in two months, since I am also dealing with HTML5's last call > comments in the WHATWG and will likely be starting work on some more > specifications in January. I don't think we need to address all Last Call comments by the end of the LC period - that's just the deadline to submit them. We can take as long as we need after that to either go back to Working Draft or produce a disposition of comments and request transition to CR. That being said, I don't think the original LC period is unreasonable, given the active ongoing implementation work on these specs. - Maciej
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 17:01:43 UTC