- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:59:44 +0100
- To: arun@mozilla.com, "Marcin Hanclik" <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
- Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:26:20 +0100, Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com> wrote: > 1. I agree that name consistency is desirable, so mediaType is now > simply type. I'll point out that <style>.type expects very few types > back, whereas for files, the picture is more complicated, so simply > calling it type has drawbacks, but since mediaType isn't used elsewhere > on the platform, I agreed that reusing the same name was desirable. Yay! Now can we please get File.URL too? :-) (It does not matter what the scheme ends up being, they're all URLs as far as author-facing APIs elsewhere are concerned, as mentioned before.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 11:00:34 UTC