Re: [XHR2] timeout

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:41:32 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>  
> wrote:
>> abort() has some legacy attached to it that I rather not copy.
>
> Such as?

Actually, apart from switching the state to 0 in the end there is nothing.  
(This does not happen for user aborts though so I still rather not copy  
that.)

Anyway, do you have opinions on the synchronous case? Do you agree we  
should use TIMEOUT_ERR there? What do the people from Microsoft think?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2009 18:18:37 UTC