public-webapps@w3.org from October to December 2009 by author

=JeffH

• oops: Re: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (EricLaw) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (Adam) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (EricLaw) (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Strict Transport Security (STS) discussion -> public-web-security@w3.org (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (part 2) (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (part 1) (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Fwd: Welcome to the W3C web security mailing list (Thursday, 3 December)
• OAuth protocol flow diagrams (Wednesday, 4 November)

Aaron Boodman

• Re: Transaction callback for localStorage mutex? (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: File writing ponderings (was: Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy) (Saturday, 21 November)

Adam Barth

• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: [widgets] Anyone working on SNIFF in Java? (Saturday, 19 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Transaction callback for localStorage mutex? (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: STS and lockCA (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: STS and lockCA (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? (Friday, 6 November)
• CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: More CORS Tuesday afternoon... (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: More CORS Tuesday afternoon... (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: More CORS Tuesday afternoon... (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: FW: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24 ( LC-2255) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: STS and lockCA (Friday, 2 October)

Adrian Bateman

• RE: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• RE: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• RE: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• RE: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: Microsoft pre-LCWD feedback on WebSocket API (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Friday, 20 November)
• Microsoft pre-LCWD feedback on WebSocket API (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 3 November)
• RE: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 3 November)
• RE: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Monday, 2 November)

Alex Russell

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Saturday, 19 December)

Alexey Proskuryakov

• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache (Monday, 9 November)

Amit Kasher

• Widget specification - liquid height support (Thursday, 10 December)

Andreas Kuehne

• Implementation of the widget signing spec (Wednesday, 21 October)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [XHR][XHR2] single source file (Thursday, 24 December)
• [XHR][XHR2] single source file (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: Why preflight per-resource rather than per-origin? (Friday, 18 December)
• [xhr] Blocked headers with underscore rather than hyphen (was: Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call) (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: [XHR] Small text correction. (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: Comments on Last Call Working Draft of XHR (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?) (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: [AC/CORS] Proper behavior for user agents who return 'null' Access-Control-Allow-Origin (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [AC/CORS] Proper behavior for user agents who return 'null' Access-Control-Allow-Origin (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: File upload superseded by File API? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• [cssom-view] caretPositionFromPoint() and views (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: CORS and HTTP error responses (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] FileReader constants (Monday, 16 November)
• [XHR2] Redirects (was: Re: [whatwg] unexpected use of the CORS specification) (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] FileReader constants (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [XHR2] timeout (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: [fileapi] urn -> URL (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.name (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: [XHR2] timeout (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [XHR2] timeout (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Tuesday, 10 November)
• [FileAPI] FileReader (Tuesday, 10 November)
• [FileAPI] FileReader constants (Tuesday, 10 November)
• [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [FileAPI] File.name (Wednesday, 11 November)
• [XHR2] timeout (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest: Last Call? (Wednesday, 11 November)
• XMLHttpRequest: Last Call? (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? (Monday, 9 November)
• [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache (Saturday, 7 November)
• Re: More CORS Tuesday afternoon... (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Adding a note to DOM2 Views (Tuesday, 3 November)
• [fileapi] urn -> URL (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) [progress] (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) [progress] (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [selectors api] test suite red values (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Accept header setting in XHR (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [XHR] Request charset is limited to UTF-8 for x-www-form-urlencoded data (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: File API commens (Thursday, 8 October)
• [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [XHR] Last Call comment on about dependencies (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [XHR] LC comments from the XForms Working Group (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Accept header setting in XHR (Thursday, 8 October)
• [cors] update (oct5) (Monday, 5 October)

Arthur Barstow

• WebApps' 2009 publication summary -> KUTGW! (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Seeking comments on LCWDs of Server-events, Web Storage, Web Workers; deadline 30-June-2010 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: [widgets] View Modes Media Feature document from Vodafone (Friday, 18 December)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 17 December 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Wednesday, 16 December)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 17 December 2009 voice conference (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs (Monday, 14 December)
• CfC: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] (Monday, 14 December)
• [widgets] View Modes Media Feature document from Vodafone (Monday, 14 December)
• Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Thursday, 10 December)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 10 December 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 10 December)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 10 December 2009 Voice Conf (Wednesday, 9 December)
• [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Tuesday, 8 December)
• CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Patent disclosure for UM? [Was: Patent disclosure for UniMess? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS]] (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Monday, 7 December)
• Patent disclosure for UniMess? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS] (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Sunday, 6 December)
• CORS versus Uniform Messaging? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS] (Friday, 4 December)
• [widgets] comments re View Modes Interface spec (Friday, 4 December)
• Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Friday, 4 December)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 3 December 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 3 December)
• Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Indexed Database API is the new title [Was: Renaming WebSimpleDB] (Wednesday, 2 December)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 3 December 2009 Voice Conf (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Wednesday, 2 December)
• [widgets] Reminder: the Widget Interface LC comment period ends December 8 (Monday, 30 November)
• [widgets] PAG Launched for Widgets 1.0: Access Requests Policy (WARP) spec (Monday, 30 November)
• [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [widgets] Testing ITS support (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Thursday, 26 November)
• [widgets] Publishing LC#2 of the WARP spec (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Postponed: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Sever-Sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Tuesday, 24 November)
• What is the Plan for Web Database? [Was: Re: Notes About Notes (Sunday, 22 November)
• Re: Unzipping content into current directory widely considered poor practice (Friday, 20 November)
• CfC: to publish LCWD of: Sever-Sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers; deadline 27 November (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Friday, 20 November)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 19 November)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 19-Nov-2009 Voice Conf (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Interface; deadline 8 December 2009 (Tuesday, 17 November)
• [widgets] Apple, excludes 2 patent applications on Widgets 1.0: Access Requests Policy spec (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Thursday, 12 November)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 12 November 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November (Thursday, 12 November)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 12 November 2009 VC (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: comments from Osmosoft on the File API (Wednesday, 11 November)
• CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [widgets] Interface: license attribute, was Re: [Widget: Warp] - license attribute (Monday, 9 November)
• What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Sunday, 8 November)
• [CORS] ISSUE-108: confused deputy problem (Thursday, 5 November)
• Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [widgets] Call for comments on pre-LC#2 of TWI spec; deadline 11 November (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [widgets]: Reminder: Request for Comments: 8-Oct-2009 LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs; deadline 10 November (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 3 November 2009 f2f meeting (Wednesday, 4 November)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 2 November 2009 f2f meeting (Wednesday, 4 November)
• CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Seeking Comments on LCWD of Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies; 6 November deadline (Tuesday, 3 November)
• [widgets] Call for comments on pre-LC#2 of WARP spec; deadline 18 November (Tuesday, 3 November)
• WebApps' publication "plans" (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session (Thursday, 29 October)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 29 October 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 29 October)
• CORS: Monday Nov 2 13:30-15:00? [Was: Re: TPAC agenda - APIs] (Thursday, 29 October)
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 29 October 2009 voice conference; TIME CHANGE FOR US Participants (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Fwd: Rich Web Application Backplane XG Final Report Published (Tuesday, 27 October)
• [widgets] Security Guidelines for Widgets? [Was: Re: [widgets] viewmodes spec] (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec? (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October (Friday, 23 October)
• CORS: email from Henry Thompson re "CORS still not getting to closure" (Friday, 23 October)
• CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October (Friday, 23 October)
• Headsup: short CfC to publish new WDs of Web Database, Web Storage, Web Sockets, Web Workers and Server-sent Events to be started (Friday, 23 October)
• [widgets] CfC to publish LCWD#3 of the Packaging and Configuration spec; deadline 26 October (Thursday, 22 October)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf (Thursday, 22 October)
• FPWD of API for Media Resource 1.0 published (Wednesday, 21 October)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Web security bar-BOF during week of 2 November? (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [widgets] Step 5 - allowing private use lang tags ; ISSUE-93 (Monday, 19 October)
• CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of DataCache API spec; deadline Oct 24 (Saturday, 17 October)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 15 October 2009 Voice Conf (Thursday, 15 October)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 15 October 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Tuesday, 13 October)
• [widgets] CfC: Change request for classes of products; deadline October 14 (Saturday, 10 October)
• [widgets] CfC: Remove the "At Risk" designation for the its:dir; deadline October 14 (Saturday, 10 October)
• [widgets] CfC: Dropping xml:lang on icon elements; deadline Oct 14 (Saturday, 10 October)
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements (Friday, 9 October)
• Request for Comments: 8-Oct-2009 LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Widget URIs; deadline 10 November (Thursday, 8 October)
• [widgets] Patent Advisory Group for Widgets 1.0 Updates spec published Recommendations (Thursday, 8 October)
• [widgets] Draft minutes for 8 October 2009 Voice Conf (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: PFWG comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration Last Call (late, very late) (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Fwd: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Wednesday, 7 October)
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 8 October 2009 voice conf (Wednesday, 7 October)
• [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Request for Feedback: LCWD of Mobile Web Application Best Practices; deadline November 6 (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [cors] update (oct5) (Monday, 5 October)
• [widgets] P&C: remove MAY and OPTIONAL assertions? (Monday, 5 October)
• [widgets] P&C: Step 8 bug when custom start file is bogus (Monday, 5 October)
• [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: ISSUE-95: P&C CR: Conformance checker behavior intermixed with UA behavior [Widgets] (Friday, 2 October)
• Web IDL and the New Scripting Coordination List (Thursday, 1 October)
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 1 October 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2 (Thursday, 1 October)

Arun Ranganathan

• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Saturday, 12 December)
• WebGL | The 3D Canvas Context for HTML (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Blob as URN was Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: comments from Osmosoft on the File API (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.name (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] FileReader constants (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: File API commens (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method (Friday, 2 October)

Arve Bersvendsen

• Re: File API: Directories and System (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Tuesday, 10 November)

ATSUSHI TAKAYAMA

• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database (Thursday, 26 November)

Bil Corry

• Re: STS and lockCA (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: STS and lockCA (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification (Monday, 9 November)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header (Saturday, 10 October)

Breitschwerdt, Christian, VF-Group

• Widget DigSign: Example of a distributor signature document is buggy (Tuesday, 6 October)

Brian Kardell

• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 8406] New: Stricter Specifications on Mouse Events Specifically primary, auxillary, and secondary default actions (Tuesday, 1 December)
• [Bug 8358] [WA] Fix for the localStorage mutex problem - release for *any* API operation except localStorage itself (Wednesday, 25 November)
• [Bug 8358] New: Fix for the localStorage mutex problem - release for *any* API operation except localStorage itself (Monday, 23 November)
• [Bug 7938] SECURITY_ERR when disallowing Database open is inconsistent with QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR for disallowing setItem (Wednesday, 21 October)
• [Bug 7938] New: SECURITY_ERR when disallowing Database open is inconsistent with QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR for disallowing setItem (Saturday, 17 October)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: [WebIDL] Trying to understand IndexGetter/NameGetter (Thursday, 8 October)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Selectors CR criteria (was re: Something else) (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API (Thursday, 19 November)
• CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Exit criteria Re: [selectors-api] Transitioning to CR (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest: Last Call? (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• TPAC report day 2 (Saturday, 7 November)
• Multitouch @TPCA 16:30-17:00 (Tuesday, 3 November)
• TPAC first day... (Tuesday, 3 November)
• More CORS Tuesday afternoon... (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs (Thursday, 29 October)
• TPAC agenda - APIs (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) [progress] (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) [progress] (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Use cases (appcache, etc) [progress] (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Use cases (appcache, etc) Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Tuesday, 20 October)
• New Progress events draft: 1.32 (Tuesday, 20 October)
• focus... Re: Touch and gestures events (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? (Saturday, 17 October)

Chris Poppe

• Date/time types in Web IDL (Wednesday, 7 October)

Collin Jackson

• Re: fyi: Strict Transport Security specification (Monday, 9 November)

Cyril Concolato

• Re: [widgets] white space handling (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: [widgets] white space handling (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: [widgets] white space handling (Friday, 18 December)
• [widgets] white space handling (Thursday, 17 December)
• [widgets] duplicated feature elements ? (Wednesday, 16 December)
• [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? (Wednesday, 16 December)
• [widgets] features: default value for required (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: [widgets] test suite: br.wgt (Tuesday, 15 December)
• [widgets] test suite: br.wgt (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Wednesday, 9 December)
• [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) (Wednesday, 9 December)
• [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization (Tuesday, 1 December)
• [widgets] editing problem (Friday, 27 November)
• [widgets] test suite, duplicated test (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [widgets] test-suite, default xml:lang (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [widgets] about test d1.wgt (Thursday, 26 November)
• [widgets] test-suite, default xml:lang (Thursday, 26 November)
• [widgets] element-based localization (Thursday, 26 November)
• [widgets] about test d1.wgt (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute (Friday, 20 November)
• [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite (Friday, 20 November)
• [widgets] About the test suite (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [widgets] Comments on LCWD #3 (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [widgets] Comments on LCWD #3 (Sunday, 25 October)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Unzipping content into current directory widely considered poor practice (Friday, 20 November)
• Unzipping content into current directory widely considered poor practice (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Tuesday, 13 October)

Dan Forsberg

• [webdatabase] Why does W3C have to worry about SQL dialect? (Saturday, 21 November)

Darin Fisher

• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 20 October)
• re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method (Friday, 2 October)
• Comment on File API's FileData::slice method (Friday, 2 October)

David Rajchenbach-Teller

• Re: suggestion - RJavaScript (Friday, 4 December)

David Rogers

• OMTP BONDI Reference Implementation fully compliant against mandatory P&C tests (Saturday, 28 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• FW: OMTP BONDI 1.1 Candidate Release now available (Tuesday, 3 November)
• [widgets] View modes security considerations (Tuesday, 3 November)
• RE: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session (Thursday, 29 October)
• RE: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session (Thursday, 29 October)
• RE: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session (Thursday, 29 October)
• FW: [widgets] viewmodes spec (Monday, 26 October)
• RE: [widgets] CfC to publish LCWD#3 of the Packaging and Configuration spec; deadline 26 October (Friday, 23 October)
• RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf (Thursday, 22 October)
• [widgets] viewmodes spec (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: HTML5: has input device: use motion detection been included? (Wednesday, 7 October)

David-Sarah Hopwood

• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24 ( LC-2255) (Saturday, 24 October)

Deborah Dahl

• RE: Multimodal Interaction WG questions for WebApps (especially WebAPI) (Friday, 23 October)
• RE: Multimodal Interaction WG questions for WebApps (especially WebAPI) (Friday, 23 October)

Devdatta

• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: STS and lockCA (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Friday, 6 November)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux

• Re: Seeking status of testing Widget Digital Signature spec (Friday, 18 December)
• [WARP] comment on subdomains (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• File upload superseded by File API? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Interface; deadline 8 December 2009 (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Work on Read before/separtely from Write? (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?) (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL (Thursday, 12 November)
• DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?) (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [WARP] IRI normalization only for HTTP*? (Tuesday, 3 November)
• [WARP] IRI normalization only for HTTP*? (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec? (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2 (Thursday, 1 October)

Doug Schepers

• Spam Alert (was: Warning Notice!!!) (Sunday, 6 December)
• Notes About Notes (was: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note) (Saturday, 21 November)
• Fwd: [office] Public Review of OpenDocument Version 1.2 (Monday, 16 November)
• Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Monday, 2 November)
• Travel Notification: Expect Delayed Responses (Sunday, 1 November)
• Changes to DOM3 Events Key Identifiers (Friday, 30 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)
• CORS Best PRactices (was: [cors] unaddressed security concerns) (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (Tuesday, 20 October)
• DOM4 Core (was: childElements, childElementCount, and children) (Monday, 19 October)
• childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Open Review of the CORS Specification (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Web IDL and the New Scripting Coordination List (Thursday, 1 October)

Drew Wilson

• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache (Saturday, 7 November)
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache (Saturday, 7 November)

Ennals, Robert

• RE: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• RE: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• RE: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• RE: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• RE: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Tuesday, 20 October)

Eric Lawrence

• FW: Feedback on the Strict-Transport-Security specification (Wednesday, 28 October)

Eric Uhrhane

• Re: The most basic File API use case (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Blob as URN was Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Thursday, 5 November)
• Next-generation file API use cases (Thursday, 29 October)

Eyal Sela

• Widget packaging conformance (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: Widget specification - liquid height support (Wednesday, 16 December)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: [widgets] Testing ITS support (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Tuesday, 13 October)

Frederick Hirsch

• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session (Thursday, 29 October)
• Proposed additional topic for joint DAP/WebApps Widgets F2F session (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: Widget DigSign: Example of a distributor signature document is buggy (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Widget DigSign: Example of a distributor signature document is buggy (Wednesday, 7 October)

Garrett Smith

• Re: Touch and gestures events (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives (Wednesday, 7 October)

Gervase Markham

• Re: STS and lockCA (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: STS and lockCA (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: STS and lockCA (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: STS and lockCA (Saturday, 3 October)
• STS and lockCA (Thursday, 1 October)

Gregg Tavares

• solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Monday, 19 October)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Thursday, 26 November)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 22 October)

Hodges, Jeff

• RE: STS and lockCA (Friday, 2 October)

Huub Schaeks

• [XHR] Small text correction. (Tuesday, 15 December)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? (Sunday, 20 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?) (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Wednesday, 9 December)
• RE: [EventSource] Comments to the current draft (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Friday, 4 December)
• Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Microsoft pre-LCWD feedback on WebSocket API (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: [webdatabase] Handling of the query arguments (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Transaction callback for localStorage mutex? (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [EventSource] Comments to the current draft (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [webdatabase] wording on "Parsing and processing SQL statements" section (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: WebDatabase bug tracking (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [web databases] SQLStatementErrorCallback (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [web databases] changeVersion error reporting (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [webdatabase] Minor Clarification Needed in Processing Model (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [web databases] about rowids (Tuesday, 1 December)
• RE: CfC: to publish the First Public Working Draft of Web Database spec; deadline 7 September (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: WebDatabase review: SQLResultSetRowList (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Exceptions in WebDatabase (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: WebDatabase open interface methods (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: WebStorage and WebDatabase - creation and exceptions (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [webdatabase] Transaction Locks (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Detailed review of 4.12. Client-side database storage (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: bug in example (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Thursday, 5 November)
• RE: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: [Bug 7938] SECURITY_ERR when disallowing Database open is inconsistent with QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR for disallowing setItem (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: Resending Re: WebStorage and WebDatabase - creation and exceptions (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: File API commens (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors (Monday, 5 October)

Ian Jacobs

• Re: Adding a note to DOM2 Views (Tuesday, 3 November)

Ingmar.Kliche@telekom.de

• Re: Multimodal Interaction WG questions for WebApps (especially WebAPI) (Friday, 23 October)

inhahe

• suggestion - RJavaScript (Friday, 4 December)

Innovimax SARL

• Letter to the W3C Web Applications WG from ISO JTC1/SC 34/WG4 (Tuesday, 29 December)

Jeff Walden

• Re: CORS and HTTP error responses (Wednesday, 18 November)

Jere.Kapyaho@nokia.com

• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published (Monday, 5 October)

Jeremy Orlow

• Re: Web Storage Mutex (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: WebSimpleDB Issues (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Transaction callback for localStorage mutex? (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Transaction callback for localStorage mutex? (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Web Data APIs (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec? (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Monday, 19 October)

Joakim Söderberg

• Summary of Media Annotations WG 5th F2F in Santa Clara (Thursday, 12 November)
• RE: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Thursday, 8 October)

John Gregg

• Re: Web Notifications, do we need a new spec? (Monday, 19 October)

John Resig

• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) (Sunday, 18 October)

Jon Ferraiolo

• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Monday, 26 October)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?) (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: [AC/CORS] Proper behavior for user agents who return 'null' Access-Control-Allow-Origin (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [AC/CORS] Proper behavior for user agents who return 'null' Access-Control-Allow-Origin (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: XHR LC (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS (Saturday, 21 November)
• File writing ponderings (was: Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy) (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] FileReader constants (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: [XHR2] timeout (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [XHR2] timeout (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] FileReader (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [XHR2] timeout (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Sunday, 8 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Web Data APIs (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: Multimodal Interaction WG questions for WebApps (especially WebAPI) (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) (Sunday, 18 October)
• Re: File API commens (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: File API commens (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: File API commens (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: File API commens (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method (Friday, 2 October)

Jonathan Rees

• [widgets] Authorities will never have authority? (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Monday, 12 October)

Jonathan Watt

• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Thursday, 26 November)
• [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Thursday, 26 November)

Joran Greef

• Web Storage Mutex (Friday, 11 December)

Joseph Pecoraro

• [DataCache] Event Handlers on DataCache (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections (Thursday, 17 December)
• [DataCache] Remove or Replace a Local Server Handler? (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: [DataCache] Updated Examples (Friday, 11 December)
• [DataCache] Updated Examples (Thursday, 10 December)
• [DataCache] CacheTransaction missing committed state (Thursday, 10 December)
• [DataCache] Unhandled Cases in Networking Changes (Thursday, 10 December)
• [DataCache] "ready" CacheEvent and Related Questions (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections (Monday, 7 December)
• [DataCache] Some Corrections (Friday, 4 December)

João Eiras

• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [webstorage] deleting a database (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [webdatabase] Handling of the query arguments (Thursday, 19 November)
• [webdatabase] Handling of the query arguments (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Thursday, 15 October)

Julian Reschke

• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• XHR LC comment: header encoding (Monday, 7 December)
• XHR LC (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: more flexible ABNF for STS? (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: [fileapi] urn -> URL (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Thursday, 29 October)
• File API comments (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: File API commens (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: File API commens (Thursday, 8 October)
• File API commens (Thursday, 8 October)

Kai Hendry

• Re: [widgets] Interface published (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: [widgets] Interface published (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [widgets] Interface published (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Implementation of the widget signing spec (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: Widget DigSign: Example of a distributor signature document is buggy (Thursday, 8 October)

kari.hiitola@nokia.com

• Re: Touch and gestures events (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Thursday, 15 October)

Kartikaya Gupta

• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Wednesday, 14 October)

Kenton Varda

• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)

Klotz, Leigh

• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Friday, 18 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Friday, 18 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 25 November)
• RE: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 25 November)
• XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Wednesday, 25 November)

Kris Zyp

• WebSimpleDB Issues (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: [webdatabase] Why does W3C have to worry about SQL dialect? (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: WebSimpleDB object caching (Tuesday, 10 November)
• WebSimpleDB object caching (Sunday, 8 November)
• Re: Web Data APIs (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)

Krzysztof Maczyński

• Moving Window and stuff out of HTML5 (Thursday, 19 November)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: Selectors CR criteria (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Progress (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 19 November)
• Selectors API 2 Status (Wednesday, 4 November)

Larry Masinter

• RE: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) (Friday, 18 December)
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) (Thursday, 17 December)
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) (Wednesday, 9 December)
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (4) (Wednesday, 9 December)
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3) (Wednesday, 9 December)
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (2) (Wednesday, 9 December)
• RE: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) (Monday, 7 December)
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (1) (Monday, 7 December)
• [public-webapps] <none> (Saturday, 10 October)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 14 December)
• Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Saturday, 5 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: suggestion - RJavaScript (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Saturday, 28 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: Moving Window and stuff out of HTML5 (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [webdatabase] Handling of the query arguments (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Proposal for sending multiple files via XMLHttpRequest.send() (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] File.name (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Friday, 6 November)
• Binary data (ByteArray/ByteVector) proposal on public-script-coord (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• CORS Background slides (Wednesday, 4 November)
• Re: More CORS Tuesday afternoon... (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Saturday, 24 October)
• Value of Server-Sent Events (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Editor's Response in the proposed process (with particular note of spec diff links) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Editor's Response in the proposed process (with particular note of spec diff links) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [XHR] Some comments on "charset" in the Content-Type header (Monday, 12 October)

Magnus Olsson

• Viewmode related issues (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Constrained specification of Icon element (Tuesday, 3 November)

Marcin Hanclik

• RE: [widgets] View Modes Media Feature document from Vodafone (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Regrets (Wednesday, 16 December)
• RE: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) (Wednesday, 9 December)
• RE: [widgets] comments re View Modes Interface spec (Monday, 7 December)
• RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 3 December)
• RE: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Thursday, 3 December)
• RE: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Wednesday, 2 December)
• RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 2 December)
• RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP (Wednesday, 2 December)
• RE: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Wednesday, 2 December)
• RE: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference (Tuesday, 1 December)
• RE: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Tuesday, 1 December)
• RE: [widgets] editing problem (Friday, 27 November)
• RE: File writing ponderings (was: Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy) (Sunday, 22 November)
• RE: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) (Saturday, 21 November)
• [widgets] FW: [whatwg] FYI: Mozilla's Resource Packages (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) (Friday, 20 November)
• [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) (Friday, 20 November)
• [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (2) (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: Viewmode related issues (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: [widgets] The people say "NO" to 1.0, was Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Thursday, 19 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Wednesday, 18 November)
• RE: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (1) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• RE: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API (Wednesday, 18 November)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• RE: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (1) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (2) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (1) (Tuesday, 17 November)
• [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API (Tuesday, 17 November)
• RE: [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Monday, 16 November)
• RE: [FileAPI] File.mediaType (Monday, 16 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Thursday, 12 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Thursday, 12 November)
• [WARP] local addresses, UPnP, comments (Tuesday, 3 November)
• RE: [Widgets] Security Considerations (Tuesday, 27 October)
• RE: [Widgets] Security Considerations (Tuesday, 27 October)
• RE: [WARP] UPnP & LAN (Tuesday, 27 October)
• [WARP] UPnP & LAN (Tuesday, 27 October)
• RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File (Thursday, 22 October)
• RE: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File (Friday, 16 October)
• RE: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing (Wednesday, 7 October)
• [VMMF] Comments (1) (Monday, 5 October)
• RE: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Monday, 5 October)
• RE: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Monday, 5 October)
• RE: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization (Friday, 2 October)
• RE: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization (Friday, 2 October)
• RE: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing (Thursday, 1 October)
• RE: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization (Thursday, 1 October)
• RE: Comments on View Modes Media Feature ED (Thursday, 1 October)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: [XHR][XHR2] single source file (Thursday, 24 December)
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest Comments from W3C Forms WG (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: [widgets] Anyone working on SNIFF in Java? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-suite: start file encoding (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Widget specification - liquid height support (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (2) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [widgets] test suite: br.wgt (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [widgets] test suite: br.wgt (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute (Tuesday, 15 December)
• [widgets] Widget Updates PAG recommendations (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute (Monday, 14 December)
• [widgets] Widget Interface Test Suite (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: Length of LC comment period [Was: Ready for LC on the various drafts I edit] (Sunday, 6 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [widgets] Test suite full coverage of mandatory aspects in the P&C spec, was Re: OMTP BONDI Reference Implementation fully compliant against mandatory P&C tests (Monday, 30 November)
• [widgets] Test suite full coverage of mandatory aspects in the P&C spec, was Re: OMTP BONDI Reference Implementation fully compliant against mandatory P&C tests (Saturday, 28 November)
• Re: [widgets] test suite, duplicated test (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [widgets] test-suite, default xml:lang (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [widgets] editing problem (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [widgets] Testing ITS support (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [widgets] about test d1.wgt (Friday, 27 November)
• [widgets] Testing ITS support (Friday, 27 November)
• Re: [widgets] Interface published (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] LCWD#3 comments (3) (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] about test d1.wgt (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] multiple co-authors (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Unzipping content into current directory widely considered poor practice (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (2) (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [widgets] multiple co-authors (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [widgets] multiple co-authors (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (2) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Constrained specification of Icon element (Thursday, 19 November)
• [widgets] The people say "NO" to 1.0, was Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [widgets] multiple co-authors (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [WARP] Call for comments on pre-LC#2 of WARP spec; deadline 18 November (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”?) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [Widgets] LCWD#3 comments (1) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Interface; deadline 8 December 2009 (Tuesday, 17 November)
• [widgets] Interface published (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Thursday, 12 November)
• [widgets] Conformance testing results (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: Constrained specification of Icon element (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Friday, 6 November)
• [widgets] Interface: license attribute, was Re: [Widget: Warp] - license attribute (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: [widgets] Definition of Instance was: Comments on Section 6 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: FW: Viewmode related issues (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: TransAnn: LCWD#3 of Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration published 29 October (Tuesday, 3 November)
• [widgets] Definition of Instance was: Comments on Section 6 of the 18-Aug-2009 LCWD of A&E spec (Tuesday, 3 November)
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Sunday, 1 November)
• Re: FW: [widgets] viewmodes spec (Sunday, 1 November)
• [widgets] Media Type Registration for application/widget (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 29 October 2009 voice conference; TIME CHANGE FOR US Participants (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 29 October 2009 voice conference; TIME CHANGE FOR US Participants (Wednesday, 28 October)
• Re: [widgets] Comments on LCWD #3 (Wednesday, 28 October)
• [widgets] P&C Last Call 3 (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [Widgets] Security Considerations (Tuesday, 27 October)
• Re: [widgets] Security Guidelines for Widgets? [Was: Re: [widgets] viewmodes spec] (Tuesday, 27 October)
• [Widgets] Security Considerations (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [widgets] Comments on LCWD #3 (Monday, 26 October)
• Re: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File (Thursday, 22 October)
• Re: [widgets] Fail on encrypted archive (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: [widgets] Test suite questions (Tuesday, 20 October)
• [Widgets] Compatibility Matrix for Packaging and Configuration (Tuesday, 20 October)
• [widgets] Step 5 - allowing private use lang tags (Monday, 19 October)
• [widgets] Fail on encrypted archive (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: [public-webapps] <none> (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [widgets] Potential bug in Rule for Identifying the Media Type of a File (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements (Friday, 9 October)
• [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [widgets] P+C spec doesn't normatively state whether attributes are required or not (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: Step 8 bug when custom start file is bogus (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: remove MAY and OPTIONAL assertions? (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: PFWG comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration Last Call (late, very late) (Saturday, 3 October)
• Re: ISSUE-95: P&C CR: Conformance checker behavior intermixed with UA behavior [Widgets] (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization (Friday, 2 October)
• [widgets] Test suite (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization (Friday, 2 October)
• Re: [widgets] Closing widget Interface issues (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (1) (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2 (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [A&E] Last Call comments (2): discovery & localization (Thursday, 1 October)

Mark S. Miller

• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? (Sunday, 20 December)
• Re: Are we making a Category Mistake? (Sunday, 20 December)
• Are we making a Category Mistake? (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Why preflight per-resource rather than per-origin? (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Sunday, 13 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? (Thursday, 10 December)
• Patent disclosure for UM? [Was: Patent disclosure for UniMess? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS]] (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS] (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: Open Review of the CORS Specification (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Tuesday, 13 October)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: [cors] TAG request concerning CORS & Next Step(s) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: [cors] security issue with XMLHttpRequest API compatibility (Thursday, 8 October)

Mary Ellen Zurko

• Re: Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24 ( LC-2255) (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24 ( LC-2255) (Monday, 9 November)

Michael Cooper

• Re: PFWG comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration Last Call (late, very late) (Wednesday, 7 October)

Michael Glavassevich

• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? (Saturday, 17 October)
• Re: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)? (Friday, 16 October)

Michael Nordman

• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache (Saturday, 7 November)
• Re: [webworkers] SharedWorker and ApplicationCache (Saturday, 7 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Sunday, 25 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Saturday, 24 October)
• Re: Value of Server-Sent Events (Friday, 23 October)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Monday, 30 November)
• seeking an editor for "Web DOM Core" draft (Saturday, 10 October)

Mike Wilson

• RE: Caching breakout session at TPAC (Monday, 9 November)
• RE: [selectors-api] Summary of Feature Requests for v2 (Friday, 16 October)

mzurko@us.ibm.com

• Re: Re: Request for Reviewers: Section 7.4 of Web Security Context: User Interface Guidelines; deadline Sep 24 ( LC-2255) (Friday, 23 October)

Nikunj Mehta

• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections (Thursday, 17 December)

Nikunj R. Mehta

• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Introduce a pause/resume pattern for coordinated access to multiple stores (Wednesday, 23 December)
• Re: to publish new Working Draft of Indexed Database API; deadline December 21 (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: [DataCache] CacheTransaction missing committed state (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: [DataCache] Some Corrections (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: Caching breakout session at TPAC (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs (Monday, 14 December)
• Indexed Database API (previously WebSimpleDB) ready for a new WD (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Saturday, 12 December)
• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Flatting APIs to simplify primary cases (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: WebSimpleDB Issues (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Wiki for WebApps' Database, Storage, AppCache and related specs (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: Indexed Database API is the new title [Was: Renaming WebSimpleDB] (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Saturday, 28 November)
• Renaming WebDatabase and WebSimpleDB (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: WebSimpleDB object caching (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: WebSimpleDB object caching (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? (Monday, 9 November)
• Fwd: Caching breakout session at TPAC (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for: Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets, Storage Workers}; deadline 19 November (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: Web Data APIs (Monday, 2 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [Bug 7938] SECURITY_ERR when disallowing Database open is inconsistent with QUOTA_EXCEEDED_ERR for disallowing setItem (Wednesday, 21 October)
• DataCache - revised editor's draft available (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: File API proposal - marrying two alternatives (Wednesday, 7 October)
• File API proposal - marrying two alternatives (Wednesday, 7 October)

Ola Andersson

• RE: Constrained specification of Icon element (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Constrained specification of Icon element (Tuesday, 10 November)

Olli Pettay

• Re: Touch and gestures events (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Touch and gestures events (Wednesday, 14 October)
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Thursday, 8 October)
• Re: Comment on File API's FileData::slice method (Friday, 2 October)

Pablo Castro

• [WebSimpleDB] Introduce a pause/resume pattern for coordinated access to multiple stores (Wednesday, 23 December)
• RE: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere (Tuesday, 22 December)
• [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere (Sunday, 22 November)
• [WebSimpleDB] Flatting APIs to simplify primary cases (Thursday, 19 November)
• Web Data APIs (Saturday, 31 October)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: [fileapi] urn -> URL (Thursday, 12 November)
• comments from Osmosoft on the File API (Wednesday, 11 November)
• RE: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Wednesday, 11 November)

Per-Erik Brodin

• Re: [EventSource] feedback from implementors (Thursday, 8 October)

Peter Michaux

• Re: Accept header setting in XHR (Tuesday, 13 October)

Peter O. Ussuri

• Re: The most basic File API use case (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Saturday, 28 November)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Monday, 23 November)
• The most basic File API use case (Friday, 20 November)

Phil Archer

• Re: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing (Monday, 5 October)

Richard Ishida

• RE: [widgets] Testing ITS support (Friday, 27 November)
• Comments on Last Call Working Draft of XHR (Thursday, 26 November)

richard.tibbett@orange-ftgroup.com

• RE: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Wednesday, 25 November)
• Re: [webdatabase] Why does W3C have to worry about SQL dialect? (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: CORS and HTTP error responses (Tuesday, 17 November)
• CORS and HTTP error responses (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (was: [ElementTraversal]: Feature string for DOMImplementation.hasFeature(feature, version)?) (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Tuesday, 20 October)
• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Monday, 19 October)

Robin Berjon

• Re: [widgets] white space handling (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: [widgets] white space handling (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (2) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (1) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (4) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Widget specification - liquid height support (Friday, 11 December)
• File API: Directories and System (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: CfC: to publish LCWD of: Server-Events, Web {SQL Database, Sockets, Storage, Worker}; deadline 15 December (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: The most basic File API use case (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Wednesday, 2 December)
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) (Tuesday, 1 December)
• Re: [widgets] Publishing LC#2 of the WARP spec (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP, was: RE: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 19 November 2009 Voice Conference (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [widgets] element-based localization (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [widgets] test-suite, default xml:lang (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [widgets] CfC: to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec; deadline 2 December (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [selectors-api] querySelector with namespace (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [widgets] Interface published (Monday, 30 November)
• Widgeon release (was P+C implementation report: Widgeon) (Tuesday, 24 November)
• P+C implementation report: Widgeon (Monday, 23 November)
• Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] default start file table vs. src attribute (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: Security evaluation of an example DAP policy (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comments on Widget URI (General) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (1) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (2) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [widgets] Interface published (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (9) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (8) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (4) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (5) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (6) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (7) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [WARP] Call for comments on pre-LC#2 of WARP spec; deadline 18 November (Thursday, 19 November)
• Trying to summarise (was Re: DAP and security) (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Let's turn WebDatabase into a WG Note (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileAPI] URL, URI, URN | Re: [FileAPI] Latest Revision of Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [FileReader API, ProgressEvents] Design patterns, FileWriter API (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: [widgets] About the test suite (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November (Wednesday, 18 November)
• Re: comments from Osmosoft on the File API (Tuesday, 17 November)
• Re: Rename “File API” to “FileReader API”? (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: What do we mean by "parking" Web Database? [Was: Re: TPAC report day 2] (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: TPAC agenda - APIs (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [widgets] CfC to publish LCWD#3 of the Packaging and Configuration spec; deadline 26 October (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 22 October 2009 Voice Conf (Friday, 23 October)
• Re: [widgets] Fail on encrypted archive (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Thursday, 15 October)
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: [widgets] Dropping xml:lang on icon elements (Friday, 9 October)
• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Re: [widgets] remove feature at risk stuff from P&C before next LCWD is published (Tuesday, 6 October)
• Re: View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Monday, 5 October)
• View modes: more precision on fullscreen (Monday, 5 October)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2 (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: Please don't call your API "simple" (Thursday, 1 October)
• Re: [widgets] P&C: LC#3 and CR#2 (Thursday, 1 October)

Salvatore Loreto

• IETF HyBi BoF (Wednesday, 21 October)

Sam Weinig

• Re: CfC: to publish Last Call Working Draft of XHR (1); deadline 18 November (Wednesday, 11 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of File API spec; deadline Nov 10 (Monday, 9 November)

Samuel Santos

• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases (Friday, 20 November)

Scott Parkerson

• [AC/CORS] Proper behavior for user agents who return 'null' Access-Control-Allow-Origin (Thursday, 10 December)

Scott Wilson

• [widgets] Anyone working on SNIFF in Java? (Thursday, 17 December)
• [widgets] test-suite: start file encoding (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: [widgets] Test suite full coverage of mandatory aspects in the P&C spec, was Re: OMTP BONDI Reference Implementation fully compliant against mandatory P&C tests (Monday, 30 November)
• [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors (Sunday, 29 November)
• Re: [widgets] Test suite full coverage of mandatory aspects in the P&C spec, was Re: OMTP BONDI Reference Implementation fully compliant against mandatory P&C tests (Saturday, 28 November)
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases (Friday, 20 November)
• Re: [widgets] multiple co-authors (Friday, 20 November)
• [widgets] multiple co-authors (Thursday, 19 November)
• Re: [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases (Wednesday, 18 November)
• [widgets] Test suite: problem with test cases (Saturday, 14 November)
• Re: [widgets interface] Tests generated from WebIDL (Thursday, 29 October)
• Re: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing (Friday, 2 October)

Sean Hogan

• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 26 November)

Sebastian Andersson

• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Friday, 4 December)
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Friday, 4 December)
• Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. (Wednesday, 25 November)

Shawn Wilsher

• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Flatting APIs to simplify primary cases (Tuesday, 24 November)
• Re: [WebSimpleDB] Allowing schema operations anywhere (Tuesday, 24 November)

Shumpei Shiraishi

• Re: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Thursday, 8 October)
• Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Wednesday, 7 October)

Simon Pieters

• Fwd: Draft PER of Associating Style Sheets with XML documents 1.0 (Second Edition) available for review (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: CfC - publish Selectors API as CR (Thursday, 26 November)
• Re: [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: childElements, childElementCount, and children (Wednesday, 21 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Monday, 19 October)
• Re: Using progress events for other purposes (Monday, 19 October)

sird@rckc.at

• Re: [xhr] Blocked headers with underscore rather than hyphen (was: Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call) (Wednesday, 16 December)
• Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call (Wednesday, 9 December)

Steffen Krüssel

• Re: [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments (Friday, 13 November)
• [WebIDL] Default Values for Arguments (Friday, 13 November)

Stephen Jolly

• Re: [widgets] Draft Minutes for 10 December 2009 Voice Conference (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP (Thursday, 3 December)
• Re: [WARP4U] WARP with UPnP (Monday, 30 November)
• Re: [WARP] "uri" attribute is confusing (Wednesday, 7 October)
• Issue with semantics of the access element in WARP (Thursday, 1 October)

SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)

• RE: [EventSource] Comments to the current draft (Tuesday, 8 December)
• RE: DAP and security (was: Rename "File API" to "FileReader API"?) (Wednesday, 18 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Wednesday, 18 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Wednesday, 18 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Friday, 13 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Tuesday, 10 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Tuesday, 10 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Monday, 9 November)
• RE: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Saturday, 7 November)
• [WARP] Comments to WARP spec (Tuesday, 3 November)
• [EventSource] Comments to the current draft (Wednesday, 28 October)
• RE: TPAC agenda - APIs (Wednesday, 28 October)

Suresh Chitturi

• [WARP] Call for comments on pre-LC#2 of WARP spec; deadline 18 November (Wednesday, 18 November)

SUZANNE Benoit RD-SIRP-ISS

• [Widget: Warp] - license attribute (Wednesday, 4 November)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: solving the CPU usage issue for non-visible pages (Wednesday, 21 October)

Thomas Roessler

• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains (Friday, 11 December)
• Re: Welcome to the W3C web security mailing list (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Fwd: Welcome to the W3C web security mailing list (Tuesday, 1 December)

timeless

• Re: [public-webapps] Comment on Widget URI (3) (Wednesday, 16 December)

Tran, Dzung D

• RE: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Tuesday, 13 October)
• RE: Is there proposal of accessing metadata of media files? (Tuesday, 13 October)

Tyler Close

• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 22 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 21 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Friday, 18 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Thursday, 17 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Tuesday, 15 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Next Steps for CORS and Uniform Messaging [Was: Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?] (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Scientific Literature on Capabilities (was Re: CORS versus Uniform Messaging?) (Monday, 14 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Thursday, 10 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Wednesday, 9 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Semi-public resources in Uniform Messaging (Tuesday, 8 December)
• Re: Patent disclosure for UniMess? [Was: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS] (Monday, 7 December)
• Re: [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS (Monday, 23 November)
• [cors] Uniform Messaging, a CSRF resistant profile of CORS (Saturday, 21 November)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? (Monday, 16 November)
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? (Friday, 13 November)
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Tuesday, 10 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Monday, 9 November)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Friday, 6 November)
• Re: CSRF vulnerability in Tyler's GuestXHR protocol? (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: CORS Background slides (Thursday, 5 November)
• Re: [cors] unaddressed security concerns (Wednesday, 4 November)

Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-111 (mouse z): Add z attribute to mouse events? [DOM3 Events] (Sunday, 22 November)
• ISSUE-110 (code-point conversion): Should we remove the code-point conversion from the D3E spec? [DOM3 Events] (Tuesday, 3 November)
• ISSUE-108: confused deputy problem [CORS] (Monday, 2 November)
• ISSUE-107 (multi-object end events): End state events in multi-object transactions [Progress Events] (Monday, 19 October)
• ISSUE-106 (mouse capture): Consider adding mouse capture/release API [DOM3 Events] (Monday, 19 October)

Xiaomei Ji

• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Friday, 16 October)
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Monday, 12 October)
• Re: propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Friday, 9 October)
• propose an API to return Range in <textarea> etc. form control nodes (similar functionality as document.caretRangeFromPoint) (Thursday, 8 October)

Yael.Aharon@nokia.com

• FW: [widgets] comments re View Modes Interface spec (Wednesday, 16 December)

Yaroslav

• Re: [XHR] Request charset is limited to UTF-8 for x-www-form-urlencoded data (Monday, 12 October)

イアンフェッティ

• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Saving Files Securely (Thursday, 12 November)
• Re: CfC: to publish new WDs of Server-sent Events, Web {Database, Sockets API, Storage, Workers}; deadline 26 October (Friday, 23 October)

余仕斌

• bug in example (Thursday, 5 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 December 2009 07:10:17 UTC