public-webrtc@w3.org from July 2013 by thread

a new API proposal piranna@gmail.com (Wednesday, 31 July)

Cross posting: Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Ted Hardie (Tuesday, 30 July)

Re: [rtcweb] SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo (Monday, 29 July)

SDP is not suitable for WebRTC Iñaki Baz Castillo (Monday, 29 July)

Re: Audio and Opus configurability for speed and quality (at the expense of bandwidth) tim panton (Thursday, 25 July)

Re: Audio and Opus configurability for speed and quality (at the expense of bandwidth) Cullen Jennings (fluffy) (Wednesday, 24 July)

WebRTC Java Applet Anton Venema (Tuesday, 23 July)

sdpMLineIndex required in RTCIceCandidate? Philipp Hancke (Wednesday, 24 July)

Re: SDP wrapper? Object-oriented API? Cullen Jennings (fluffy) (Wednesday, 24 July)

Re: Recap from WebRTC World Cullen Jennings (fluffy) (Wednesday, 24 July)

Why people munge SDP Cullen Jennings (fluffy) (Wednesday, 24 July)

muting/hold (was Re: Cisco's position on the WebRTC API) Silvia Pfeiffer (Wednesday, 24 July)

Cisco's position on the WebRTC API Cullen Jennings (fluffy) (Tuesday, 23 July)

Re: Unified plan IPR cowwoc (Tuesday, 23 July)

IPR related to draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00 Iñaki Baz Castillo (Tuesday, 23 July)

A view on the current webRTC API and next step... Göran Eriksson AP (Tuesday, 23 July)

Google's position on the WebRTC API Justin Uberti (Tuesday, 23 July)

Proposed message to send to the IETF rtcweb and W3C WebRTC working groups. Ralph Meijer (Monday, 22 July)

Trickle ICE questions? Roman Shpount (Monday, 22 July)

server-centric vs. P2P (was Re: Proposal: Different specifications for different target audiences) piranna@gmail.com (Monday, 22 July)

Proposal: Different specifications for different target audiences cowwoc (Friday, 19 July)

RE: [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions ..) Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) (Thursday, 18 July)

Fwd: [rtcweb] e= lines (Re: Summary of Application Developers' opinions ..) Harald Alvestrand (Thursday, 18 July)

RE: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) (Wednesday, 17 July)

Moving forward with SDP control Harald Alvestrand (Tuesday, 16 July)

Discussing new API proposals Stefan Håkansson LK (Tuesday, 16 July)

Be vewy, vewy qwiet... Martin Thomson (Monday, 15 July)

Re: JavaScript API on top of SDP Roman Shpount (Monday, 15 July)

URL.createObjectURL() for DataChannels piranna@gmail.com (Monday, 15 July)

Re: [rtcweb] Summary of Application Developers' opinions of the current WebRTC API and SDP as a control surface Stefan Håkansson LK (Sunday, 14 July)

DOM Futures (was: Mediastream Recording implementation) cowwoc (Saturday, 13 July)

do we want success and failure callbacks on addStream? Jim Barnett (Friday, 12 July)

Improve error message when browser denies access to getUserMedia() cowwoc (Tuesday, 9 July)

Locus of API discussion Ted Hardie (Tuesday, 9 July)

TPAC Registration open Dominique Hazael-Massieux (Tuesday, 9 July)

WebRTC Web APIs for On-board Multimedia Devices Handling and Control Venkateswar Reddy Melachervu (Monday, 8 July)

Expose capabilities / Allow for IP:Post based connections / Better abstraction Johannes Hange (Saturday, 6 July)

[Bug 22428] Please unify the WebSocket and RTCDataChannel "readyState". enum RTCDataChannelState { "connecting", "open", "closing", "closed" }; VS const unsigned short CONNECTING = 0 [...] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Wednesday, 3 July)

[Bug 22428] Please unify the WebSocket and RTCDataChannel "readyState". enum RTCDataChannelState { "connecting", "open", "closing", "closed" }; VS const unsigned short CONNECTING = 0 [...] bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 2 July)

Re: Teleco Integrators vs Web Developers vs Browser Implementers Eric Rescorla (Tuesday, 2 July)

[Bug 20819] no priority API bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 2 July)

Re: API design Randell Jesup (Monday, 1 July)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2013 23:22:18 UTC