- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:16:45 +1000
- To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
- Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote: > On 7/24/13 3:49 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:03 PM, cowwoc <cowwoc@bbs.darktech.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 23/07/2013 7:45 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote: >> >> Do take my suggestion for a .mute() function on MediaStream as such a >> concrete proposal. >> >> Another concrete proposal is to add a bandwidth limitation to the >> constraints handling. >> >> And a third is to introduce receive-only peer connections instead of >> having to do: >> desc.sdp = desc.sdp.replace(/a=sendrecv/g, "a=recvonly"); >> Maybe this part can go into the RTCConfiguration? > > Note that we sent out a separate call for input like this: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2013Jul/0176.html Excellent - were the replies captured somewhere? If mine aren't there, please regard my input as a reply to those. I'm only just learning what features require me to mangle SDP. > Regarding the "mute" (stop sending temporarily) and bandwidth parts I > did an input: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2013Jul/0260.html Sorry if I was just repeating things. I'm sure if I had seen consequences of those submissions, I wouldn't have needed to repeat it. So, hopefully we can make these happen this time around. Thanks, Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2013 09:17:32 UTC